Jonathan’s Re-election: A Hopeless Pursuit Of Hope In Continuity | Nigeria’s corrupt government

16 years of PDP’s failure, Adedeji Adeyemi, Jonathan’s re-election, Nigeria’s 2015 general election, Nigeria’s corrupt government

 

 

Two-term Presidential Democracy is a beautiful and interesting idea of government in its fundamental assumptions and considerations. It has been established upon some rational thought in hope to sustain the values of democracy itself and to engender a climate for good governance. Because democracy is generally centered on the people, elections become a part and parcel of the system, where people, periodically, come to terms on who they want to lead or not to lead them.

2015 is here and the elections are in February (just some days away). We have got an interesting case at hand in this country and for me, the question is: should we re-elect President Goodluck Jonathan or should we hire another president? My answer is simple and clear. I say we hire a new president.

I will share in a moment the reasons behind my position after we examine some foundational tenets of two- term presidential democracy, which happens to be what we practice in Nigeria. This will help build-up to establishing my position.

Some of the rational thinking embraced by democrats for the support of a two-term presidency are as follows:

First, democracy is about the government of, for and by the people (utterly people centric). The right of the people to vie for election from time to time and also to exercise their power to elect their own government is simply to protect the people’s democratic right to a government of and by themselves.  If there ever be a government elected of and by the people, who happens not to govern for the people, then the same people reserve the right to vote out such a government or vote for another to carry out government in the best interest of the people. This is a form of check on the government. A government can misgovern, but then, the people can decide to vote it out. As such, ideally, first-terms are periods of evaluation upon which the government’s re-election should be based. Therefore the idea that a government would have to seek re-election for a second-term becomes a sort of incentive that should propel performance in the first-term. Also, you want to guard against and prevent anti-democratic traps like a monarchical or life- presidency situation by ensuring one person does not politically polarize the country for life. The last point I will mention here is that you want to give room for a dynamic transition of government. Because life itself is dynamic and transitory so government has to be.

Situate this in Nigeria and you’ll conclude that the 2015 Nigeria general election is another test on the viability of our two-term presidential democracy.

Back to why I’m positioned and support that we hire a new president: it is simply because our democratic system gives us the opportunity to change a non-performing government. I don’t belong to any political party today but my frustration about how Nigeria has been governed dwells at two levels. First is at the Presidential Ticket level and second is at political party level.

At the presidential ticket level, Nigeria gave the mandate to President Jonathan in 2011. I was also a supporter of the Jonathan/Sambo ticket in 2011. The logic behind my support was simple; Jonathan emerged without the partisan realpolitik of the PDP. By this I mean, being the vice-president, a relatively insignificant position in Nigerian politics at the time, he (Jonathan) didn’t have to do much but just get nominated by the front-man, which was late President Yar’Adua. Vice-presidents are only constitutionally relevant to replace the president. The extent of their good to the government was the full prerogative of the president and you really don’t have to be a heavy weight politician to be nominated.

My imagination like most Nigerians was that this gentleman (Jonathan) had a clean slate on which he could really transform the country. He would be less susceptible to any arm-twisting by many trade-offs typical of  the political process of securing a presidential ticket if he was to push himself forward from ground-zero. I thought, at least his providential ascension would grant him a good deal of insulation from many political interests that could force-his-hand.

More so, at the sentimental level, we all witnessed a quintessential common-man rise to power in what seemed to be a divine orchestration. The “I had no shoes” story of Jonathan resonated with millions of Nigerians; he seemed an embodiment of a political messiah. This was very okay for many people. The process upon which he emerged even engendered more sympathy towards his person as the country witnessed Yar’Adua’s cabal covet his chances of acting as president. Even when the dying president’s health was in serious doubt, he stayed gentlemanly throughout the entire process until the Senate invoked “the doctrine of necessity” and ultimately, Nigerians gave him a full mandate at the 2011 elections. We believed, we hoped, we trusted and then we stood with him. Jonathan promised transformation, “a breath of fresh air”, he actually promised a lot enough to catalogue.

Five years have happened to Nigeria since we elected Dr. Goodluck Jonathan to preside over government. It’s time to renew that mandate. Yes! It’s time all the principles and tenets of two-term presidential democracy come to play. We have reached a point of either choosing to continue with this government or change it. But I’m not in any doubt we have to change this government.

I rather change because I have the democratic right to vote out a government that doesn’t work for me after I hired it with my vote. In all fairness, I’m sure President Goodluck Jonathan can say the good things he has done for this country. But he has to be fair to over 100 million citizens of Nigeria that are still in poverty. His (Jonathan) government has not had any meaningful positive bearing on their livelihood. Democratic government is of the people, for the people and by the people. The government led by Dr. Jonathan has been of the people and by the people at 2011 elections, but for five years it has never shown up for the people. And that’s why we, the people will vote him out.

I ask some serious questions that we have to answer faithfully for ourselves and for our country, Nigeria. Do you think Jonathan will do the expectations of the people in a second-term? Is it when there’s no more significant incentive to concede to the will of the people we are expecting him to do the needful? Everyone observes that democratic leaders tend to be complacent in their second-terms because of the mindset that they are not returning anyway. Do you honestly think that Jonathan even has any incentive to perform if re- elected? I have answered these questions faithfully to myself and for my country and I have come to a firm conclusion without second-guessing to vote for change. I have now lost hope in Jonathan’s presidency and I am hopeless like many Nigerians that continuity in this direction will yield significant positive results. The only hope there can be is to change this government and hope.

 

The beauty of the ingenious two-term presidential system we practice grants us the power and periodical opportunity to hope again. If we discover there isn’t hope in a new government, we will also vote it out again after four years. But to stick to the status-quo is to accept everything that is careless, reckless, insensitive and poor about this government for another four years; it’s hopeless. As we seize another opportunity to decide on the future of our country, posterity bestows upon us a duty to elect the personnel that will carry out government in the interest of the general public and President Jonathan has clearly shown that’s not his forte.

President Jonathan inherited an economy where the crude oil price began to soar to unprecedented heights. The price has fluctuated near and above US$100 per barrel since February 2011 to August 2014. This means, as a nation, we earned more value from crude oil than ever before in the history of our nation. Sadly, we sight claims and counter claims of mismanagement, theft, squander and misappropriation of public funds. The government even agrees to losing revenues daily of about 400,000 barrels of oil due to illegal bunkering, vandalism and production shut-in. Impunity reigns supreme as we see no serious action to give a meaningful report to the public on these matter. Today, we are seeing an unprecedented drop in petrol dollar earnings; I don’t see this government doing more with less. I suspect all pronouncement of the government on how it hopes to manage the situation because it has ever been reputable for paying lip service to its duties.

Many allegations of corruption on government officials fly in the dailies and we witness blatant passive reactions to these. So much scandal on corruption that it is almost seen as normalcy when headlines of news agencies carry billions of dollar figures on corruption allegations. It is so precarious that a former Head of State, General Ibrahim Babangida, who is also reputable for engendering large scale corruption in Nigeria during his military tenure, caled his cohorts at that time saints if they were to be compared to this government. As a matter of fact, the president even finds it hard in his own language to differentiate between stealing and corruption. I’m utterly afraid of this government because Dr. Goodluck Jonathan has shown time and time again that he presides over a government that is simply not willing to confront corruption resolutely. From the look of things do you think President Jonathan even in another term will fight corruption just because he has started promising to fight corruption in his campaign for re-election? Well, you can’t be entirely sure though, but you can take an educated guess.

This stance of the government has put our economy on a free fall. It doesn’t matter how much we earn as a nation, it doesn’t even matter what they say our GDP is, as long as the inequality gap is not breached, we will never taste the dividends of democracy. Again, it doesn’t matter how much the increase in megawatts the country has gained in this government, as long as you don’t have electric power supply, then it counts for nothing. Nigerians don’t even want an 11, 7 or 5 point agenda. All we want is one-point power agenda. Fix power in the smartest innovative and effective way and see how it bears on the life of every Nigerian. And to be frank, I won’t bet on the approach and politricks of this government to fix power within another four years.

 

After several calls on the president since the abduction of over 200 girls in a school in Chibok, he has only found it important to visit Maiduguri after 9 months. What message do you pass to the people with that sort of disposition? The people are angry at this type of decorum that forsakes the poor and down trodden. The president won’t go there at the heat of things but he’ll make efforts when it’s close to elections in February. Whether that’s a right judgment or not, you will forgive those that bear that feel that way easier than you will forgive the president for his poor handling of such a dire situation.

One can observe countless faults in this government. If you allow a thorough evaluation, you would write a serial. It’s even harder to determine what the president stands for, what he is strong on and what his boundaries are. But Nigerians won’t crucify him, even though Doyin Okupe, one of his Senior Special Assistants has likened him to Jesus Christ – they will only not vote him again.

Voting President Jonathan out will be the most important message Nigerians will send to politicians and political parties – that power truly belongs to the people. At every point in time Nigeria has been dissatisfied about a government they voted into power, it had always been the military that was forced to change the government in what eventually turns out to be worse. This time the people can do it and the elections in February will show. Like the US, Japan and India came to a point in their history where they had to vote out the same government they voted in for not performing, the time for Nigeria has come.

As a matter of fact, Jonathan is not the alpha neither is he the omega of Nigeria’s problems. And this brings me to the second level at which my frustration about how Nigeria is governed dwells – the political party level. In as much as I personally advocate a change of government based on the fact that for five already, the government has failed the people, continuing with the same political party that has had the chance at the federal level for 16 years has to be also questioned. So far, the ruling party, PDP has produced three presidents for Nigeria. On the graph of performance, the line has moved from top to bottom in succession of presidents. In our recent democratic history, the popularity of the president has only been this low when President Obasanjo attempted a third-term bid. In fact, President Goodluck’s current popularity is at the lowest as it manifests in how his politics divides opinion and loyalty within his own party.

And here’s my frustration: 16 years of time in any generation is a great time to see landmark attainments through. When you cut through the clutters and get down to the common man on the street in Nigeria, the only landmark attainment that has had a significant bearing on lives at the bottom is the telecommunication revolution, saw through by the Obasanjo administration. Any other attainment that anyone can classify as major either has no significant bearing on lives of the general masses or has been marred by corruption over time. By “significant bearing on lives at the bottom” I mean, If it is correct that we have over 100 million Nigerians in poverty, then any policy that doesn’t affect at least 10 million (10%) poor Nigerians positively is not significant by any margin.

Before giving him the mandate in 2011, we loved the persona and carriage of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan. Perhaps he was in the right political party at the wrong position at the right time. “Right political party” because it is evident the PDP is capable of bearing good fruits as seen in some of its achievements (at least one can’t totally take all away from the PDP). And “Wrong position at the right time” because if one imagines it was Donald Duke or one of those excellent PDP governors in the South-south that was nominated as Yar’Adua’s running mate, our situation may have just been totally different. In any case, it is the PDP that produced Obasanjo, Yar’Adua and Jonathan. I’ll recommend we try another political party at the federal government, at least for another 8 years. This is not necessarily because the opposition is better, but more because this sort of competition is excellent for our democracy. The notion that an opposing political party is capable of swaying votes and changing the government is healthy for democracy and development. All parties will have to be at their best and the country will surely be better for it as we have seen from examples in other leading democracies.

 

 

Adedeji Adeyemi Political Analyst and Convener, Organising For Change mail@adedejiadeyemi.com

B.Sc. Political Science (Redeemer’s University, Nigeria) M.A. International Relations (University of Birmingham, UK)


 

The opinions expressed in this article are the Author’s and do not reflect Sayelba Times’ Editorial Policy.

Buhari: History and the Wilfully Blind – By Shaka Momodu

Thirty years ago, he faced the cruel and ignominious fate of being tied to the stake and a hail of bullets from marksmen ended his precious life. That person was Bartholomew Owoh (26) who alongside others, Bernard Ogedengbe (29) and Lawal Ojuolape (30), were executed by firing squad after being arrested and tried for drug trafficking. The case of Bartholomew Owoh, the youngest of them all, was particularly tragic. At the time of his arrest, the crime did not carry capital forfeiture -the punishment was six months imprisonment. But Decree No. 20 was hurriedly promulgated and back-dated by one whole year to take effect from when he and others committed the crime and on the basis of that they were all tried, found guilty and executed by firing squad. Someone recently asked me if this actually happened and I said, “read the records of history against Buhari’s name”.

The man responsible for that “judicial murder and crime against humanity” is today the APC presidential candidate, General Muhammadu Buhari, who has shown no remorse, no regret and has tendered no apology for his actions. Furthermore, he has sought no remission or restitution for that act of pure evil. He is the same man being daily burnished in the media by revisionists as the new face of “change.”

 

I sometimes wonder how he has been able to sleep, eat and wake up every morning for the past 30 years knowing that his hands are stained with the blood of these young men.

Before the promulgation of Decree 20, drug offences were bailable and it is instructive that Bartholomew Owoh was even on bail when it was promulgated. My personal investigation reveals that immediately the decree was promulgated, the young man expressed his desire to escape from the country. But his father prevailed on him to stay back, promising that he would protect him from the grave injustice. The young Owoh heeded his father’s advice and stayed. But his father clearly underestimated the deadly resolve of General Buhari to implement the new decree against his son and others. I can imagine the horror the poor father must have felt on hearing that soldiers had marched his son to the Bar Beach firing range to be executed.

 

I can imagine the last few moments of Bartholomew’s earthly life as he watched soldiers march around in a choreographic and synchronised parade to carry out the orders of General Buhari. What was going on in his mind? Did he have the moment to say goodbye to his family? Definitely no. He must have been too shocked by what was about to happen. What were the last word(s) he heard on this earth before the hail of bullets hit and silenced him forever? Have any of Buhari’s supporters bothered to ask or imagine? Have any of them put himself on the receiving end of such grave injustice? I guess the last word Owoh heard was: “fire”! And the last sound? The crack of gun shots as hot lead pierced through his body ripping him apart. He probably twitched for a few seconds and his precious life ended just like that. Where and how were he and others buried? In an unmarked grave perhaps! Expectedly, their families were denied the privilege of paying last respect to their loved ones.

 

If Bartholomew Owoh, the youngest of the three were still alive today, he would have been (56) – about the same age as Buhari’s running-mate, Yemi Osinbajo. He would have been married with children; somebody would have called him father; somebody would have called him uncle. But he died in his prime, as his life was brutally cut short by no less a brutal regime with the red hand of murder. What is a life worth to those who casually say Buhari has changed when the evidence points to the contrary? What is the value for human life to the revisionists and those uninformed bloggers who spread fantasies of Buhari’s daughter who is alleged married to an Ibo Christian man all in a bid to sell him?

I can imagine the eternal guilt Owoh’s father must have felt and probably still feels, that’s if he is still alive for prevailing on his son not to escape.

The irony here is that Bartholomew Owoh and his co- travellers were no saints; just as Buhari who ordered their execution is no saint. But the difference is that while the supporters of Buhari tell us that he has changed and are willing to forgive and give him a second chance, the same Buhari never gave Bartholomew and his co-travellers the opportunity for a second chance – to change and be good citizens of the society.  Each time my mind drifts to this monumental injustice, I still freeze in shock and  a cold chill runs through my body. How could this have happened in our country? But I am a witness to this part of our history.

I doubt if many Sai Buhari! crusaders feel the same way. But I know for sure that they won’t be so supportive of Buhari if their relatives were among the three Nigerians executed by a back-dated law. Can anyone of his supporters out there stand up and be counted on this score?  Needless to say that many of them were too young to appreciate the gravity of the injustice while many others were not even born then. So, they can be excused for not being witnesses of records but they can’t be excused for refusing to use the lessons of history as guides to the future.

 

The frenzied campaign to dress Buhari in borrowed robes and foist him on Nigerians must be interrogated without let. Buahari’s critics must never  allow themselves to be intimidated into silence by those who attack them for daring to interrogate the past, present and acts recorded against the general. Moreso, as the Sai Buharis have the right to air their opinion and support for the general without molestation. It is the fairest minimum for a healthy debate.

It is in this regard that I take exception  to Buhari’s supporters who would rather re-write history and shout critics down for daring to air contrary views from the make-belief narrative being used to dupe a new generation of  Nigerians, especially bloggers, facebook and twitter savvy youths. Whatever the case, facts remain  sacred, comments are free but the records of history endure.

One of the often forgotten victims of Buhari’s high-handedness is Busari Adelakun. Does that name ring a bell? If it doesn’t, let me introduce him to you. Busari Adelakun was a grassroots mobiliser like no other. He was so instrumental to the emergence of the late Chief Bola Ige as the governor of old Oyo State in 1979 that he was appointed Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs despite his low academic qualifications.  But Adelakun was to fall-out with his boss, Ige, and pitched  tent with his estranged Deputy, the late Chief S.M Afolabi. Alongside  other  former Unity Party of  Nigeria (UPN) stalwarts, Adelakun moved to the rival National Party of Nigeria (NPN) and worked for its candidate, Dr. Omololu Olunloyo, in the August 13, 1983 governorship election which he won. Olunloyo was sworn-in on October 1, 1983 and three months later, December 31, 1983, a group of soldiers led by Buhari, overthrew the democratic government.

One of those arrested by the new junta was Adelakun. He was herded into jail alongside other politicians. While Adelakun was not put on trial, he was nonetheless kept in jail despite his poor health, he was an ulcer patient who needed regular treatment and a special diet.

But he was denied proper treatment and food; leading Adelakun to suffer in prison until he died. Even after his death, the military junta would not release the corpse to his family. He was yet another  Second Republic politician who met his untimely death as a result of the in-human conditions he was subjected to in Buhari’s detention camps.

The same man is now being canonised by a cabal of primitive wealth accumulators, money changers and flawed progressives whose motivation  is anything but altruistic.

 

 

APC, Buhari, Change and Corruption

For God sake! How can a man who, according to Professor Wole Soyinka, “Built a career out of human rights abuses” suddenly become the change agent for the New Nigeria?

He has become the man who will cure Nigeria of all afflictions such as corruption, insecurity, etc. The only message coming out from Buhari is: “I will fight corruption and insecurity,” but he has been short on details on how he plans to achieve these twin objectives. He is yet to give Nigerians an economic blue-print, five weeks to the presidential election. In the face of dwindling revenue, General Buhari is yet to articulate  an innovative, and creative  road map on how to move the economy forward.

It is not enough for Buhari and his party to tell us that he will fight corruption without telling us how. Of course, that is the easiest claim any politician can make but the statement cannot be taken as a commitment. It is all talk, and talk is cheap if it is not backed by an action plan which is currently missing.

For the life of me, why should the APC National Chairman, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun brand every Nigerian who opposes Buhari’s presidential ambition as corrupt? Is that not a gratuitous insult? Is this not a typical example of an elder behaving badly? Why are these people so self-righteous when we see how corrupt they are too?

My worst fears were confirmed after reading news reports credited to the APC chairman recently that Buhari will not probe past corrupt acts because he wants to draw a line in the sand and move on. I chuckled and then laughed.  If this is Buhari’s position, how then will he fight corruption, when even before the election, he has given a blanket amnesty to those accused of being corrupt? Can anyone spot the contradiction in the public message of “change” and the utterances of the APC leadership? In one breath, they accuse anyone who is opposed to Buhari’s ambition as corrupt- and in another breath, Chairman Oyegun stated that Buhari won’t probe past corrupt acts. Hear him: “The only people I can think of, who will fear the Buhari presidency are those who do not want change; they are those who want to continue with business as usual; they are those who want to continue to profit from the level of corruption in the society.

“The message will be clear – whatever you engaged in before that was detrimental to the people of this country, please stop it. There will be a line drawn in the sand; on one the part is the past, the other side is the future.” How will this deter people from corrupt acts if-  past crimes carry no weight of  punishment?

If the signals from Odigie-Oyegun are anything to go by, then the clamour for change by the APC  may end up just giving Nigerians more of the same or just selling a bad apple disguised as an orange.

Now hear Buhari in Port Harcourt where he went to launch his campaign: “I will send corrupt people to Kirikiri.” Really?  (Probably without trial).  That would have made sense if the PTF probe report wasn’t so damning.

But unfortunately, Buhari’s Spartan incorruptible and austere credentials being trumpeted by Oyegun and his supporters have been ripped apart with his indictment in the management of the Petroleum Support Trust Fund, PTF.  Based on the probe report conducted in 1999-2000, the PTF under Buhari’s supervision was mismanaged. The report was however neither made public nor was it acted upon by former President Obasanjo.

In its summary, the committee had advised Obasanjo to “set up a high powered judicial panel to recover huge public funds allocated to the PTF and to take necessary action against any officer, consultant or contractor whose negligence resulted in this colossal loss of public funds.”

 

According to the report, the sum of N25,758,532,448 was mismanaged by the Afri-Project Consortium (APC), a company contracted by the PTF as management and project consultants. Buhari as PTF chairman was said to have also “delegated to them the power of engineers in all appropriate projects requiring such power-” which made them assume absolute powers to initiate, approve and execute all projects by the PTF.

The mismanagement that took place in the PTF under Buhari’s watch was said to have been carried out by APC (the company) in their capacity as management and project consultants. Both their management services fees and budgets for several projects carried out during the existence of the PTF were greatly overpriced.

The question now is who will send Buhari to Kirikiri for the mismanagement, corruption and huge financial losses suffered by the taxpayers when he was chairman of PTF?

With his indictment for mismanagement by a committee instituted in 1999 by Obasanjo,  Buhari’s ability to manage the Nigerian economy and fight corruption has being called to question. Will he lead by example by voluntarily surrendering himself at Kirikiri Prisons. Imagine the effects of such an action on many corrupt people who currently walk the streets free.

 

The opinions expressed in this article are the Author’s and do not reflect the editorial policy of Sayelba Times

Buhari: Which South-west?

There is tragic irony in the choice of Professor Yemi Osinbajo as the South-west answer to the Muhammadu Buhari deficit in Yoruba-land. To be counted as a credential of the nominee would be the fact that he is married to the granddaughter of the late political juggernaut, Chief Obafemi Awolowo. I expect that very soon a much orchestrated campaign visit to Ikenne would materialise where the reinvented Buhari would plant a specially packaged millennia peck (sharia permitting) on Mama HID Awolowo’s century old cheeks.


Yet one of the mindless cruelties and victimisation of Awolowo’s political camp by then military head of state, General Muhammadu Buhari, was the seizure of Awolowo’s international passport, which resulted in the consequence of not being able to go for his annual medical check-up for the first time in his adult life (Awolowo died two years later in 1987). In tandem, the residential abode of the political icon in Lagos and Ikenne were besieged and ransacked by Buhari’s security goons.


Beyond the factor of the compensatory concession of the presidency to the Yoruba in 1999, the next crucial determinant of former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s success at the presidential election in 1999 was the political reciprocity of the ‘north’ to his candidacy. Shunned by his geo-political constituency of the South-west, he was practically adopted by the north as political payback for his generous identification with the region in deed and precept, when he was the military head of state.


By the same token, the question begs to be asked — what is the political debt of gratitude that the South-west owes Buhari? At the time Buhari seized power, the government of Alhaji Lateef Jakande had embarked on a turnkey infrastructural project that would have had a revolutionary mobility impact on the economy of the South-west in particular and Nigeria in general.


The project was the construction of a light rail city wide system known as the Lagos metro line-an infrastructure that had proved indispensable to the evolution of all developed economies. Can we for a moment imagine the consequence of the absence of the sub-way rail transportation system for the London or New York mega polis?


One of the first steps Buhari took as military head of state was the cancellation of this socio-economic transformative project. And the tragedy did not stop there. For violating the terms of the contract of the project, Nigeria had to pay a penalty of about $600 million. And again, the tragedy did not stop there. The penalty of $600 million actually translated to over 60 per cent of the entire cost of delivering the project-yet this was the choice Buhari made.


How a man so socially and economically obtuse and cruel can now be peddled as the solution to the problems substantially created by the megalomaniac misdeeds of rulers like him beats the imagination hollow.
On October 13, 2000, Buhari led a delegation of prominent Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) personalities including General Buba Marwa, Alhaji Aliko Muhammed, Alhaji Abdulrazak,  Alhaji Hassan and some others to confront Governor Lam Adesina of Oyo State in Ibadan on his characteristic divisive platform.


Said Buhari: “Your Excellency, our arrival here is to discuss with you and your government our displeasure about the incident of clashes between two peoples, my people and your people…The Fulani cattle rearers and merchants are today being harassed, attacked and killed in Saki like in any war. In the month of May 2000, 68 bodies of Fulani cattle rearers were recovered and buried under the supervision and protection from a team of Mobile Police from Oyo State Command.”


The unfounded allegation provoked a response from the Oyo State police commissioner:
“First to speak was the Commissioner of Police who debunked all the claims made by the General.  Instead of the claims by the General that the natives were killing the Fulanis, the police commissioner said pointedly that the opposite was the case. The killings of the natives by the Fulanis were duly reported to the police and, of course, we can’t make arrest because as soon as they kill they migrate to other areas. Who are you going to arrest? So that is the problem.”


Governor Adesina concluded by questioning Buhari’s patriotism and nationalism and made a telling reference to the subversive role he was, at the material time, playing against the Obasanjo government:


“My appeal will be that effort must be made to unite this country and that will be to the best interest of all Nigerians. I am appealing to the Arewa Consultative Forum under which auspices our distinguished Nigerians are here. In recent times, they have been sending wrong signals to a number of us who believe in the unity and peace of Nigeria. You have been too critical of the efforts of the federal government. I am saying this because Nigeria at this point cannot afford to break and words you northern leaders utter are very weighty. At the South here, we normally analyse them critically.”


In a rather self-debasing manner Nigerians are being told they lack discipline and are in dire need of task master Buhari as antidote, but is there a greater act of indiscipline imaginable than an army officer taking arms against the state to overthrow a democratically elected government?
If in the improbable event of Buhari been elected president, on what ground would we stand to condemn a military coup against his government? And consistent with this treasonable predisposition, his campaign organisation recently went on record as openly declaring support for Army mutiny.


What greater lack of discipline is there than a former ruler of Nigeria habitually lapsing into parochial laden ethno-regional fulminations; regularly throwing Buharispeak tantrums on his preconceived sense of entitlement to the presidency of Nigeria-the dog and the baboon will soak in blood; not treating the Boko Haram insurgents like the Niger Delta militants amounts to an injustice against the North…
What of the anti-corruption avenging angel platform? We may not need to wait too long for substantial answers to this query-as we eagerly await the release of the report of the inquiry into the activities of the defunct Petroleum Trust (special) Fund (PTF) under his executive chairmanship.

Did saint Buhari not absolve the late General Sani Abacha (under whom the PTF was established and lasted) of any iota of corruption even as governments and banks the world over were returning tonnes of Abacha stolen dollars to Nigeria?
And is it not instructive that even before the election, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has been begging off from its candidate’s vaunted platform of anti-corruption? – as attested by the amnesty on corruption issued by party chairman, John Oyegun, a few days ago “the future of the people of this country is too important for us to spend valuable time trying to dig into the past”.

Buhari: A Leopard Does Not Change Its Colour

Wole Soyinka

The grounds on which General Buhari is being promoted as the alternative choice are not only shaky, but pitifully naive. History matters. Records are not kept simply to assist the weakness of memory, but to operate as guides to the future. Of course, we know that human beings change. What the claims of personality change or transformation impose on us is a rigorous inspection of the evidence, not wishful speculation or behind-the- scenes assurances.

In Buhari, we have been offered no evidence of the sheerest prospect of change. On the contrary, all evidence suggests that this is one individual who remains convinced that he is one ex-ruler that the nation cannot call to order.
Buhari enslaved the nation. He gloated and gloried in a master-slave relation to the millions of its inhabitants. It is astonishing to find that the same former slaves, now free of their chains, should clamour to be ruled by one who not only turned their nation into a slave plantation, but forbade them any discussion of their condition.

Nor must we omit the manner of Buhari coming to power and the pattern of his corrective rule. Responsibility for the national condition lay squarely at the door of the ruling party, obviously, but against whom was Buhari’s coup staged? Judging by the conduct of that regime, it was not against Shagari’s government but against the opposition.

The head of government, on whom primary responsibility lay, was Shehu Shagari. Yet that individual was kept in cosy house detention in Ikoyi while his powerless deputy, Alex Ekwueme, was locked up in Kirikiri prisons. Such was the Buhari notion of equitable apportionment of guilt and/or responsibility.

Recall, if you please, the judicial processes undergone by the septuagenarian Chief Adekunle Ajasin. He was arraigned and tried before Buhari’s punitive tribunal but acquitted. Dissatisfied, Buhari ordered his re-trial. Again, the tribunal could not find this man guilty of a single crime, so once again he was returned for trial, only to be acquitted of all charges of corruption or abuse of office. Was Chief Ajasin thereby released? No! He was ordered detained indefinitely, simply for the crime of winning an election and refusing to knuckle under Shagari’s reign of terror.

One is only too aware that some Nigerians love to point to Buhari’s agenda of discipline as the shining jewel in his scrap-iron crown. To inculcate discipline however, one must lead by example. For the exercise of a changeover of the national currency, the Nigerian borders air, sea and land had been shut tight.
The story of the thirty something suitcases it would appear that they were even closer to 50 – found unavoidable mention in my recent memoirs, YOU MUST SET FORTH AT DOWN. For the exercise of a changeover of the national currency, the Nigerian borders air, sea and land had been shut tight. Nothing was supposed to move in or out, not even cattle egrets. Yet a prominent camel was allowed through that needles eye.

Not only did Buhari dispatch his aide-de-camp, Mustapha Jokolo, later to become an emir- to facilitate the entry of those cases, he ordered the redeployment as I later discovered – of the Customs Officer who stood firmly against the entry of the contravening baggage.

What does one choose to include or leave out? What precisely was Ebenezer Babatope’s crime that he should have spent the entire tenure of General Buhari in detention? Nothing beyond the fact that he once warned in the media that Buhari was an ambitious soldier who would bear watching through the lenses of a coup-detat. Babatope’s father died while he was in Buhari’s custody, the dictator remained deaf to every plea that he be at least released to attend his father’s funeral, even under guard.

•Professor Wole Soyinka wrote this in 2011. It is reproduced here for its contemporary relevance.

Why Buhari may not be elected President – By Sabella Abidde

From 1973 until his death in 1987, I was an ‘Awolowo-man’. I still am! In some ways, Chief Obafemi Awolowo had equals; but in many other ways, the mountain and the oceans were his and his alone. To me, he was the greatest Nigerian who ever lived. You may debate my assertion, but really, what’s there to debate? Verifiable data are there to support my claim. But beyond the data are the everyday realities that attest to the superior accomplishments of Awolowo. Ask yourself this simple question: “Who was on the stage before Awolowo; and what’s the political stage and space been like since his death?” In another  time and place, he’d be philosophised and declared a statesman extraordinaire.  He was that good. He was that great a human being.

But amongst the current crop of high-level politicians, ideologically and philosophically, Maj.-Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd) stands closest to Awolowo. He is a clear disciple of the sage. He himself may not say it; but the characteristics are apparent for sharp minds to see. Thousands of politicians run around the country claiming to be Awoists, but really, the vast majority are counterfeits. I tell you this: If Buhari had not been a military man, he most likely would have been an “Awolowo-man”. And so too would have been Col. Abubakar Dangiwa Umar (retd.).

Buhari has missed out on the Presidency because of several calculating forces. There are some Nigerians who hold his military background against him. They seem to forget that he came to the rescue at a time when the country needed to be rescued. How soon they forget the mind-numbing extravagances that characterised the Second Republic (1979-1983), as represented by the then National Party of Nigeria. How soon they forget that the Shehu Shagari regime was mortgaging their future. How soon they forget the excesses of Umaru Dikko and others. If Murtala Muhammed were alive, they most likely would have crucified him, too.

Second, the Nigerian media allowed itself to be manipulated by repeating lies and damaging myths that his opponents spread about him. Wings of the media publish without verifying the facts; they publish gossip as the gospel truth. They want you to believe nasty things about the man. Don’t! He is not the ethnic and religious extremist they paint him to be. Third, the stealing-fleecing elite know that their wrong doings will come to an end the day we have a President Buhari!  The fact that Awolowo was going to stop the rot, and perhaps, probe them, was one of the reasons they denied him the Presidency. Today, when they think of Buhari, they think of Awolowo. This scares them.

On the other spectrum are the elite who are afraid of the long arm of justice; afraid that the key to the “Central Bank” will be taken away from them; and afraid of the sanity and progress that will follow. This was a man who, in the very short period that he was in power, gave us sunny days and hopeful nights. He enthroned sanity and orderliness and progress and a sense of purpose and accountability.

Especially since 1999, instead of economic growth, we have regression. Instead of political progress, we have stagnation. Instead of Buhari, they forced Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, and Jonathan down our throat. What’s more, colonising forces opposed to our country’s complete liberation seem to be against his ascension. Buhari, unlike many others, is not a man that will genuflect sheepishly before the imperialists. And Buhari, like Awolowo before him, is not a saint. But this is a decent, pious, able and capable humane human being. He is a credit to our republic!

Since 1999 there have been no fewer than 200 men (and women) who made their ambition known in terms of contesting the presidential election.  Some were not serious candidates, and even if they were, they had no chance of winning their own electoral ward. A few others were so bad they couldn’t have won their household even though they were the master and leader of their household. And of course there were the jokers. The dreamers. The pretenders. The masqueraders. The marionettes. The zombies. The charlatans. And the thoroughly unqualified.

To be sure, Prof. Pat Utomi and a few others were/are qualified to lead and turn the country around; but Buhari has been the most qualified, and the most patriotic of all. This was true in 1999, 2003, and 2007 and in 2011. He lost the election four times. He lost because of the reasons I stated earlier; and also because of other forces that ganged against him: the vote counters, and the courts.  They all conspired to cheat him, and by extension, cheated posterity. The forces that ganged up against Awolowo, are today working against Buhari.

Some pundits have advised that “Buhari should leave the electoral stage for the younger generations.” Why should he? In the first place, he is a relatively young man. Second, his reasoning and decision faculties are still in order, and in fact, his mind is sharper than many men half his age. Third, his ideas and worldview are still relevant and is a man who is open to other people’s contrary assessments.

He is a man with a steady voice, steady hands and legs and with an intellect to match. Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, and Jonathan do not have advantage over him. And none of his other rivals have advantage over him. What’s more, his standing, in and outside of the country, is an added benefit.

Another set of analysts opined that Buhari – though capable and qualified to lead the nation – cannot win a presidential election. This is not only false, it is a defeatist argument. He is electable! In a level playing field, he will win. He will win across all the geographic zones. If all eligible voters are allowed to vote, and if all votes are truly counted, Buhari will win. He will win because Nigerians know him. They know and understand that he will not use his office to enrich himself; they know that he will fight corruption and nepotism and political stupidity; and they know that he will help to actualise our collective dream and aspiration. With President Muhammadu Buhari, there will be order and a new national culture.

 

2015 elections – by Josiah Idowu-Fearon

INEC Chairman, Prof Attahiru Jega

History, it is often said, “repeats itself”; on the contrary, it is people who refuse to learn from history that repeat the past.

Nigerians are being prepared to face another round of elections in February 2015 in order to usher in a new government that will be in place for another period of 4 years.  How prepared are we, what do we need to do in order to avoid the carnage that was unleashed on the Northern parts of Nigeria and Akwa Ibom immediately after the results of the presidential election were announced to the waiting nation?

Nigerians must learn from the mistakes of the very last general elections and do all possible to avoid those mistakes.  As we await 2015 – the wounds from 2011 are yet to heal. From what we gather,

• Hundreds of the lives lost will never be brought back and the wounds never fully healed.
• Thousands of businesses lost are yet to be re-started.
• Hundreds of residential buildings destroyed are yet to be rebuilt.
• Most of the places of worship that were destroyed are yet to be rebuilt due to inadequate assistance from both the State and Federal Governments.

While these are personal losses that will never be fully replaced, Nigerians must all come together and learn lessons from the findings of the Presidential Committee – Sheikh Lemu Committee.  The writer of this article was privileged to have served on that committee as well as the Kaduna State committee of seventy members that focused on the 2011 crises. These reflections therefore are made so as to draw the attention of the various stakeholders to their role in making the forthcoming general elections violent free.

We draw the attention of all our politicians in this country to the following observations from the findings and recommendations of the two committees mentioned above that investigated the crisis that erupted during the last general elections.

All political parties are called upon to please allow for internal democracy, by that it is meant that the following should be avoided in order to prevent implosions that will certainly affect all Nigerians.
Imposition of candidates by party leadership – candidates should emerge democratically through a process that involves all card-carrying members of each political party.
Agreed modalities by each political party membership for sharing political positions must be adhered to and respected by all members.  For example, where there is an agreement on which zone is to fill which political office, we plead that our politicians should honour that agreement. This was a major cause of 2011 Post Presidential and Gubernatorial elections in one particular State.

Our politicians should resist the temptation to enforce themselves on the electorate, we plead that they resist the temptation to remain in power or come to power at all costs!

To all politicians seeking election or re-election, remember, leadership is a trust from God. The Arabs say: la haula wa la quwwata illa billahi (there is no power but God). God delegates and therefore all leaders will give an account to this God eventually.  The desire to be in power at all cost brought about the deaths of 943 lives and 838 injured Nigerians following the last presidential riots! This time round, this must be avoided.

Lemu’s Committee came across a state where lives were lost and property worth millions of Naira destroyed because Politicians refused to abide by a previous arrangement.  This must never be allowed this time especially as parties go into their primaries.  We plead with our politicians to abstain from inflammatory language and the campaign of calumny; they must not see an opponent as an enemy that must be exterminated. Political campaigns should and must be based on issues and promises that can be fulfilled.  We call on those who have money among them to use their money to develop their areas and refrain from sponsoring unpopular candidates seeking political power. This has always resulted in the deaths and destruction of the properties of innocent Nigerians to the exclusion of members of sponsors of such wicked schemes! Unfortunately, no government in this country has ever either fully compensated for or given enough assistance to victims of these avoidable crises.

Religious leaders should refrain from the negative use of religion as a way of getting their members elected into political positions. From our findings, this is a way many religious leaders in this country today have amassed so much wealth to the point of competing with their members in every facet of materialism. This practice has and, unless stopped, will continue to pitch one religious community against another, simply because a political leader who owns his/her being in power to his/ her religious community will always give preferential treatment to that community.  For Nigerian electorate to be rightly guided, religious leaders should call for honesty, integrity, transparency on all Politicians irrespective of their religious professions.  Nigerians are a religious people, the writer of this article is pleading with our religious leaders to avoid a religious war erupting in 2015 by resisting hate preaching and divisions among Nigerians along religious lines.  Our religious leaders are called upon to encourage the electorate to vote according to their convictions and not to sell to the electorate any candidate on the basis of being Christian or Muslim.

It is rather unfortunate that some of our senior religious leaders are today pitching one tribe or section against the other within the same geographical area. This has become very pronounced in the last few years. Various tribal and ethnic compositions that had lived and respected each other are today strange bed-fellows as a result of the use of religion to divide various tribal and ethnic groups within a given area. This has become very pronounced in certain parts of Nigeria today. The Muslims preach ummatun wahidatun (one community) while the Bible talks about (one faith, one Lord, one baptism) irrespective of tribe or ethnic origin. We plead with these religious leaders who, for selfish and pecuniary reasons are fanning the embers of racial superiority to please desist as we prepare for the next general elections. Like the politicians, when crises breakout, neither they nor their families suffer!

On the side of our traditional rulers, we call for sincerity, honesty and fairness.  Traditional rulers are to see themselves as fathers to all within their domains – they should be above ethnic and religious sentiments. A traditional ruler who is Muslim is not the traditional ruler of the Muslims in his domain alone he is the leader of all Muslims, Christians and those who do not belong to either of these two major religions of our country.  Traditional rulers are therefore called upon to resist the temptation to side one politician against the other.  When traditional rulers are seen to be fair and just to all, those being led or governed will follow suit.

As the individual politician visits our traditional rulers, we plead with them to be sincere in their counsels, put the needs of their subjects to each and admonish them on the failure to carry the electorate with them on getting to power. Our traditional rulers are respected as the voices of their subjects; they are therefore to represent their subjects to all seeking their support without discrimination. When our traditional rulers play this father-for-all role without discrimination either on religious or tribal grounds, their subjects will obey and cooperate with them.

Media practitioners have a major role to play as we pray and plan to avert the disaster that visited fifteen states following 2011 presidential election results.  We affirm the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that guarantees every citizen the freedom of expression.  However, we would plead with the Media to help avert a repeat of 2011 by displaying responsible news dissemination.  We urge the ladies and gentlemen of the media to avoid false or malicious reporting and adhere to factual reporting. We would even go as far as pleading that even with factual reporting the security of our nation; peace and peaceful co-existence must be their criteria before any factual reporting is made public.

Nigeria seems to be at another crossroads as she approaches 2015 general elections, the vibes are not encouraging but, if suggestions in this article to these selected stakeholders are taken seriously and implemented, we may just survive and not have another blood-letting experience like we had in 2011. The current situation calls for sacrifice from these selected segments of our communal life as a country. These groups must be willing and prepared to let go their ambitions for the well-being of this nation. Who knows, the Lord may give them a better and rewarding positions or opportunities to be relevant in the future.

Dr Idowu-Fearon is Bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Kaduna

The Jonathans and rot in Bayelsa politics (1)

When in early January 2014, I got a call alerting me to the fact that President Goodluck Jonathan and the First Lady were not happy with Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State and were therefore fishing for a replacement, I laughed it off. I couldn’t and wouldn’t believe it. My response was curt: “They are not so dumb as to start another ‘wahala’ considering what they put the state and the people through…we all know what they did to Governor Timi Sylva.” Unfortunately, recent events and pronouncements have validated the January call: Mr. and Mrs. Jonathan have decided to replace the current governor of the state. But why?

And why is it that this President and his wife cannot act in ways that bring prestige to the Presidency, and respect to their persons? Are they not tired of derision, bedlam and macabre dance? Do they realise that their position is temporary, and that anything, just anything you may think of, can happen? So, what’s all these “yeyerity” and “gragra” by the President and the First Lady all about? I will come back to this, later.

In mid-2007, the expectation was that Chief Francis Doukpola would replace Goodluck Jonathan as the governor of Bayelsa State after being anointed the Vice-President by the outgoing president, Olusegun Obasanjo. At that time, not too many people in the state knew who Timipre Sylva was. Within the larger Ijaw community, Sylva was considered a neophyte. He was never part of the Ijaw struggle with roots in the old Rivers State. But before anyone knew what was happening, Doukpola’s name had been removed and replaced with Sylva’s.

There are two competing accounts as to how and why this happened. There are those who believe that the ascendancy of Sylva was as a result of a political arrangement between Obasanjo, Dr. Edmund Daukoru, the former Minister of State for Energy, and now the traditional ruler of Nembe Kingdom in Bayelsa State, and the outgoing state governor, Jonathan. This account posits that Daukoru installed his political son, Sylva, because he needed the state government’s approval for his private aspirations.

The second account holds that even though Jonathan could have insisted on Doukpola, he did not push or fight the matter because, he quickly realised he could easily push and pull Sylva, and not Doukpola, who is known as a political heavyweight. He was right. In analysing Jonathan, many seem to forget that he was a disciple of the late Melford Okilo – a onetime federal parliamentarian, federal minister, and former governor of old Rivers State. You couldn’t be a student of Okilo, and not be adept at politics or reading tea leaves.

But somewhere along the line, both men misread their political Bible and became staunch enemies. Sylva, it was said, complained that “Jonathan and his wife were insatiable and wanted the master key to the state’s coffer.” Second, they wanted total control of every-and-anything Bayelsa. In essence, they wanted the state as their fiefdom. But of course, they were not the only ones wanting this and that and that and this from Sylva. The governor, it was said, did his best to satisfy major and lesser gods in the state. But after a while, he couldn’t take it anymore. He rebelled and attempted to assert control.

Sylva was very close to President Umaru Yar’Adua and his wife and to former Governor James Ibori; hence, he felt safe and secure undermining Jonathan. Jonathan, on the other hand, bided his time. He was angry quite alright, but he didn’t show it. All he did was pout his lips and growl behind closed doors. He waited and waited and waited some more. And then fortune and misfortune came calling all at once: Yar’Adua died, Jonathan took over and, and as the great Fela Anikulapo-Kuti would say, “everything scatter scatter” for Governor Sylva. Jonathan also saw to it that Ibori had no hiding place in Nigeria.

That Sylva was going to be thrown out of office, was just a matter of time. As fate would have it, he miscalculated by pursuing tenure elongation in the court of law. Had he contested the 2011 election (along with Jonathan and others) perhaps, he’d still be in office today. But somehow, I doubt that. Why? That’s because Jonathan, in spite of his many trips to churches and Israel, is not sold on the idea of forgiveness and redemption. He doesn’t take kindly to slights. And just before Sylva was thrown out of office, he was humiliated: he was stoned during a public outing with Jonathan present.

Before the stoning and the eventual ouster, something sinister happened. Jonathan and his wife played the “Good cop-Bad cop” game with Sylva. Jonathan was naturally hostile towards Sylva, while the President’s wife appeared friendly and understanding. But it was all a ploy. The governor was being played. During this period, how much did Sylva part with as gifts to Mrs. Jonathan? I doubt if he himself knows the exact amount.

During the election cycle that brought the current governor to office, Doukpola attempted a comeback. Many Bayelsans have argued that aside from Doukpola, the most qualified candidate was Dr. Godknows Boladei Igali, who was a former Secretary to the Bayelsa State Government and once Nigeria’s ambassador to Sweden. He had distinguished himself in many capacities. But he had one stumbling block: Mrs. Patience Jonathan. To the hearing of acquaintances, he was accused of being an enabler (of what needs not be said here).

Enter Mr. Henry Seriake Dickson! In spite of my best efforts, no one close to the corridors of power has confided in me what transpired between the Jonathans and Dickson (before he was sanctioned to contest and allowed to win the election). What are the deals he agreed to? Did he, like some folk, take ungodly oath to “always obey commands and instructions”? And did he, as a former law enforcement officer and parliamentarian, know what he was getting into?

My hunch is that he knew, but was too happy to pass up the chance at becoming the governor. As my friend, Olayinka Oyegbile, has said, “He was happy to replace Sylva, now it is his turn. The whip used for the first wife is hidden at the back of the door for the second…it is his time to meet the Emperor’s wrath.” Not minding how he came into office, I have empathy for Governor Dickson. The time to cull the excesses and ravenous tendencies of the Jonathans has come.

To be concluded next week

Culled from Punch

What Exactly is ‘Clueless’ About Goodluck Jonathan? (2) – By Femi Aribisala

Few governments of Nigeria have been as purposeful as that of Goodluck Jonathan.

I am the Chairman of Financial Nigeria International Limited. As chairmanships go, it is an honorary position. All the work is actually done by the Managing Editor, Jide Akintunde, who is really my employer; and his able assistant, Martins Hile. The company publishes Financial Nigeria magazine; a development and finance journal that provides an in-depth digest of the Nigerian economy and other frontier economies in sub Saharan Africa every month. I write a column in this on “Nigeria and the World.”

Jonathan

If you want to know what is happening in global development and various sectors of the Nigerian economy, presented from an objective and non-partisan point of view, you cannot do better than Financial Nigeria.

Over the past five years, Financial Nigeria has organised what we call the Nigeria Development and Finance Forum (NDFF). This colloquium is held in leading (financial) capitals around the world. The first three were held in London, England. Then we moved to Washington D.C., United States. The one of this year was held in New York, U.S.A. The purpose is to provide policy briefings and investment opportunities in Nigeria to the international community and Nigerians in the diaspora; and to tell them why we believe that Nigeria is now a major frontier market they need to come and invest in.

Financial Nigeria is a private non-governmental organization. We are neither backed nor financed by the government. But we contribute our widow’s mite to Nigeria’s development by showcasing Nigeria to the world. Therefore, we fly government functionaries, captains of Nigerian industries and other members of the Nigerian intelligentsia to these NDFF gatherings, and give them the platform to tell the world the changes that are now taking place back home.

Those who have participated at these sessions from Nigeria include Prof. Chinedu Nebo, Honourable Minister of Power; Dr. Sam Amadi, Chairman/CEO, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission; Dr. Kingsley Moghalu, Deputy Governor, Financial System Stability, Central Bank of Nigeria; Mr. Roberts Orya. M.D., Nigerian Export-Import Bank; Mr. Gimba Ya’u Kumo, M.D., Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria; and Senator Udoma Udo Udoma, Chairman, UAC Nigeria Plc. The U.S. Department of Commerce has become one of our organizing partners for NDFF conferences in the United States.

Financial Nigeria would not be doing this every year if we did not believe Goodluck Jonathan’s administration is making a major difference to the Nigerian economy. We would not be doing this if we did not know that Goodluck Jonathan’s Transformation Agenda is laying a concrete foundation for Nigeria’s economic growth and development.

Economic renaissance

When you point to the giant strides Nigeria is making under Goodluck Jonathan, in spite of the Boko Haram insurgency in the North-East, some cynical Nigerians maintain you are either looking for a government “brown envelope,” or you want to replace Reuben Abati as the government spokesman. But I wonder who else is hankering after a handout from Goodluck Jonathan. Could Barack Obama also be looking for a job as our president’s press secretary?

At the U.S.-Nigeria Trade and Investment Forum organised by the Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation of the Americas (NIDOA) in Washington DC in 2012, Obama acknowledged Nigeria is now a strategic centre of gravity in Africa, even proclaiming the country “the world’s next economic giant.” He declared U.S. readiness to invest in Nigeria’s success on a wide range of issues. This perspective cannot be divorced from the salutary measures put in place by the Jonathan administration.

Later that year, Obama sent Hilary Clinton, his Secretary of State, to Nigeria. Clinton’s visit was followed by the signing of a bi-national commission agreement to facilitate U.S.-Nigerian cooperation on issues of common concern and shared responsibility. It is on record that Nigeria is the only African country with whom the United States has signed this kind of agreement, and it did not take place until Jonathan became president.

Africa’s economic giant

Under Jonathan, the Nigerian economy has been growing at an average annual rate of 7%. After a number of postponements by previous administrations, the Jonathan administration re-based the Nigerian GDP. The new figures released by the Nigerian Bureau of Statistics indicate that Nigeria’s GDP is now $503 billion; nearly double the previous estimates. This means Nigeria has leapfrogged South Africa, whose GDP is around $350 billion, to become by far the biggest economy in Africa.

This has pushed Nigeria up by twelve places to become the 23rd largest economy in the world; level-pegging with Poland and Norway, but now ahead of Belgium, Venezuela and Austria. Some of the sectors that showed marked improvement include those where the Jonathan administration made judicious interventions: including agriculture, housing and (Nollywood) entertainment. This shows the government’s economic policy is well-aligned with the growth sectors, and it belies all the negative noises currently being made by the “born to rule” delusionists of the APC.

Nigeria’s emergence as Africa’s premier economy under Goodluck Jonathan is bound to give a filip to the economy by attracting even more foreign investment to Nigeria. Indeed, within the last three years, Nigeria has emerged as the preferred destination for foreign direct investments in Africa. For the second year running, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has ranked Nigeria as the number one destination for investments in Africa, and as having the fourth highest returns in the world.

The World Bank also forecasts that Nigeria will receive this year an inflow of $21 billion in remittances from Nigerians living and working abroad. This will place Nigeria as the top recipient of foreign remittances in Africa; followed by Egypt with projected remittances of $18 billion.

In addition, Nigeria became this year the first country in West Africa to host the World Economic Forum (WEF). It was the most successful forum of its kind in history, boasting a global reach of 2.1 billion people according to estimates. It raised $68 billion in investments for Africa, according to Dr Philip Rosler, the Managing Director of the Forum. Surely, these developments are not the outcome of “clueless” economic policies by the Jonathan administration.

Agriculture

In the agricultural sector, there is a major revolution unfolding under Goodluck Jonathan’s Transformation Agenda. There is now more private investment in agriculture, including bank lending, than ever before. The new regime of fertiliser subsidy is well-targeted. Middle-men and ghost-farmers have been eliminated. Fertilizer distribution and allocation has been digitalised, thereby eliminating the fraud and nepotism that characterised the process in the past. Farmers now receive assistance in the form of loans, equipment on lease and seedlings.

The result has been dramatic. Under Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria has reduced its food imports by over 40% as of 2013, moving the country closer to self sufficiency in agriculture. The increase in food production has helped to stabilize food prices, driving down inflation into single digits. Today, Nigeria is now the largest producer of cassava in the world, with an output of over 45 million metric tonnes in 2014 according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

The Minister of Agriculture, Akinwumi Adesina is determined to bring about a sea-change in the way Nigerians regard agriculture. The new operational philosophy is that agriculture must be seen as a business and not just as a means of livelihood.

Capital market

In the capital market, President Jonathan is pro-reform and a firm supporter of institution-building. His support has been instrumental to the sustenance of the reforms instituted by the Director-General of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ms. Arunma Oteh. These reforms have restored confidence to the Nigerian capital market in the aftermath of the crash of 2008/2009.

Today, the main index of the Nigerian Stock Exchange, the All Shares Index, has surpassed its pre-crisis level. It is significant that the Nigerian capital market and the naira have held firm; unlike other frontier and emerging markets which experienced downturns when the reversal of capital flows followed the slowdown (or tapering-off) of the bond-buying programme of the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States.

Under Goodluck Jonathan’s leadership, the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA) was established by law to manage Nigeria’s sovereign wealth fund (SWF) as obtainable in almost all oil-producing countries of the world. This Fund of funds is an important assurance that Nigeria’s oil wealth will be trans-generational.

Industries

All indications point to the revival of the industrial sectors and the Small- and Medium-scale Enterprises (SMEs) under the Jonathan administration. For example, FBN Capital, one of the leading financial services groups in Nigeria, avers in a recent report that there is “a dramatic increase in manufacturing growth” in the country. The pool of vocational skills to support the industrial sector is being developed with the revival of the Industrial Training Fund, National Power Training Institute of Nigeria and other vocational centres that are designed to provide manpower for the development of the industrial value-chain.

An industrial revolution has been re-ignited with the revival of automobile assembling plants in Nigeria under the leadership of the indefatigable Minister of Commerce, Trade and Investment, Mr. Olusegun Aganga and with the full support of President Jonathan. Under this administration, Innoson Vehicle Manufacturing Company (IVM), Nigeria’s flagship indigenous automaker, began the sale of its first made-in-Nigeria cars and SUVs in August 2014.

Nigeria has now become a major destination for multinational investment in car manufacturing. Big auto giants, including Peugeot, Nissan and Hyundai, now either assemble, or entirely manufacture, their cars, SUVs, trucks and buses at various locations in Nigeria,

The evidence is overwhelming: “Clueless” Jonathan has revolutionized Nigeria in more ways than many have perceived or are willing to acknowledge. Under his administration, Nigeria has made and is making giants strides. Perhaps the administration should be blamed for not tooting its own horn more stridently. But the truth is that many people who are against South-South rule have simply been maligning the government. These attacks have no validity in fact.

Nigerians should not allow themselves to be deceived. There is no doubt that on the basis of merit alone, Goodluck Jonathan deserves another term in office. Few governments of Nigeria have been as purposeful as that of Goodluck Jonathan. (CONTINUED).

A President’s Report Card (1) By Okey Ikechukwu

Today we begin an evaluation of some of the major policies and programmes of the Jonathan administration, as well their impact on national development. This evaluation will not begin with the major policy underpinnings in the Transformation Agenda, as that would come in later interventions. Today we shall be content with largely ‘episodic’ issues. The danger this presents is that picking single good or bad programmes, or actions, of a government allows counter-comments that could use same as summary proof of either genius or incompetence. This can easily mar a cogent analysis. It would have been good to begin by situating the regime within the political economy of regional cleavages and elite distrust within which it was born and how it has so far navigated this terrain, using the Transformation Agenda. But that is a matter for another day.

Let us begin by pointing to a little-acknowledged paradigm shift in the conduct of elected public officers introduced by the president. It was something of a national surprise when, last year, President Goodluck Jonathan addressed Nigerians and presented a mid-term report. The report was an account of his stewardship so far. The move had several advantages. First it provided a standard of self-assessment that was hurriedly emulated by many state governments and even non-state actors. Second, it created the image of a president who had the presence of mind to actually prepare and address those who elected him into office and invite them to confirm and contest his claims about performance. Third, the president’s mid-term report took the winds off the sales of some of his detractors, who could then not put him on the defensive, as was usually the case on such occasions. These later were constrained to react to his self-assessment, rather than overwhelm him with the negative prognosis.

Of course, the matter of whether or not anyone agreed with the ‘report’ was secondary to the fact of an existing report which had set the agenda for public discourse on the government and on governance. The move worked. The opposition found itself reacting to the propriety, or otherwise, of the report and its details.

When, therefore, on October 1 the president also used the occasion of the 54th independence anniversary to address the nation on the journey so far, it was yet another occasion for stock taking. He said: “This is also the tenth month of our journey into a new century, having marked the centenary of our nation in January this year” and acknowledged that the nation was in a sombre mood, occasioned by “…the crises of nationhood occasioned by the activities of terrorist elements who have done the unimaginable to challenge our unity as a people”.

True, the terrorists in the land have maimed, defiled and wrecked thousands of lives and neighbourhoods. True, the Victims Support Fund recently launched by the federal government was a response to this. True, the fund is an independent, multi-sectoral charity that is designed to solicit financial and other resources to augment government’s statutory intervention, in bringing succour to the injured, the displaced and the bereaved. True, there is also now the Safe Schools Initiative, a long overdue intervention that aims to provide and promote safe learning environments for education nationwide, and especially in the North-east region and other vulnerable areas. But these are episodic interventions, commendable as they are. Again, they are needed and vital interventions all the same.

There is today a Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP), which was introduced to create jobs, generate wealth, diversify the economy, substitute imports, boost exports, and broaden the tax base (NIRP, 2014). Sustaining the implementation of the master plan will drive industrialisation and midwife related economic gains for the nation. The National Enterprise Development Programme (NEDEP), which is designed to create millions of jobs, improve productivity and drive national development, is also to impact on the youth bulge, reduce unemployment, reduce crime and improve national and personal security. The programme will harness the opportunities in the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Sector (MSME), it will also promote inclusive growth, through skills training, job development and wealth creation. It will be coordinated by a National SME Council, with representation from the three tiers of government to streamline and harmonise SME activities and programmes.

Another intervention of the Jonathan administration, with projected wide positive impact on the nation and the economy is the Integrated Tax Administration System (ITAS). This targets a re-engineering and automating of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) core tax administration processes. Such a seamless, integrated solution that incorporates international best practices for revenue administration with clear monitoring and evaluation systems, can only lead to measurable results. As a major governance solution, ITAS supports improved revenue collection, eliminates corruption in the tax system, and improves corporate governance, transparency and efficiency in overall revenue administration. The result can only be visible reduction in the turnaround times for providing services to taxpayers, thus promoting voluntary compliance.

The ITAS has also reduced tax compliance costs and expanded the tax system to create a harmonised system. It has also widened the tax base and eased the registration of eligible corporate and individual tax payers. The impact of this is easy to see, because a harmonised TIN could be utilised as national security number that may be used in all official documents and transactions carried out by tax payers. All things considered, and with ITAS in tow, the government is well on its way to achieving the 2014 tax revenue collection target of N4,182,394, 656, 000. The foundations are yielding results, aren’t they?

Regarding the power sector, highlights of major improvements in the power sector since the inception of President Jonathan administration include: an increase in the total amount of electricity generated from 3,674 megawatts (MW) as at December 2013 to 4,306MW currently. There is massive inflow of investments, leading to the conclusion of some power plants and others due to be completed before the end of the year. The MoU signed with General Electric (GE) can only further leverage the drive for improvements in the energy sector, so will the revival of the National Integrated Power Projects (NIPPs) with most of the 10-medium-sized gas-fired NIPP plants at over 80% completion.

The Kashimbilla dam, which will serve as one of the global examples linking the nexus of food, water and energy being constructed by the federal government, would be ready for commissioning this December. Work will also soon commence on the Mambilla hydro power project. It was initially designed to provide 2, 600MW, but has now been redesigned to generate about 3,050MW of power.  While the Nigerian Rural Electrification Agency speaks of providing electricity to some 295 communities in different villages across the country, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has explained that the market was stable, but required some loan to help support its transition into a contract-based regime. Terms and conditions for accessing the funds from the CBN have been unveiled by NERC.

•Regarding health, the World Health Organisation (WHO), last week officially declared Nigeria Ebola-free after six weeks of no new cases. Then, good news, the Executive Secretary of NHIS, Dr. Femi Thomas, just disclosed that the federal government has extended the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to students of tertiary institutions, under a new arrangement called the Tertiary Institutions Students Health Insurance Programme. The government has also directed all military hospitals in the country to immediately commence the provision of medicare for retired military personnel in the country, irrespective of whether they can or cannot pay. The costs of such treatments are to be charged to the NHIS.

The federal government and Bayelsa State Government have also signed a an MoU on the transfer of the Cottage Hospital, Otuoke, from the state government to the federal government as an outreach hospital for the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa. The MoU is perhaps the first step towards eventually transforming it into the teaching hospital of the Federal University in Otuoke.

The assurances of the Minister of Agriculture that the government would generate about $11.5 billion from cocoa this year suggests that all the goings on in that ministry has not been without impact on agricultural productivity. The federal government’s agreement with Germany and Pakistan on pragmatic development of cotton and its entire value chain through the supervision and coordination of Arewa cotton is also coming on board, even as the CBN has been directed to set aside N50 billion as agricultural mechanisation intervention fund for farmers to encourage wheat production, in line with the Agricultural Transformation Agenda (ATA). The government has also approved N922m to mop up 7,000 metric tonnes of breeders foundation and certified wheat seeds. This will expand the wheat value chain in the country and protect endangered farmers.

The implementation of the Nigerian Sugar Master plan and the N500 billion this would save annually are all still episodes in governance. The holistic approach of government to sustainable development shall come later.

NIGERIA: Why We Must Talk! – A no-holds-barred compendium by Henry Omoregie

“Even if you vote Buhari in 2015 in his backyard, and JONATHAN WINS (inevitable) you will still be lynched by his impoverished brainwashed ALMAJIRIS especially if you are not wearing a HIJAB… Awon ode buruku… It happened in 2011… The lynchers never cared who you voted for as long as you couldn’t recite Quranic Verses….
Not many Nigerians are aware that the Northern Region paid custom duties to the Western Region until 1976, when Murtala Mohammed took over the reins of Government. Or that as at 1975 when Murtala Mohammend overthrew the Yakubu Gowon administration, the Niger Delta enjoyed 45% rents and royalties? Murtala
Mohammed slashed it to 20% (Decree No. 6 of 1975) to assuage the Northern States, before Olusegun Obasanjo, through the Aboyade Technical Commission which recommended the removal of the remaining 20% of the rents and royalties, finally nailed the coffin of the Southern States without any protest from the people of the Niger Delta or other parts of the South.
Since then the North has been having advantages in appointments and resource distribution and have been robbing Peter to pay Paul.”

The average Nigerian is endowed with dogged, never-say-die, ”it-won’t-happen-to-me”, ”I-will-make-it” attributes.

Lord Frederick Lugard should be shocked (in his grave) to see us still together after 99 straight years of one year, one trouble.He advised the British authorities then, about the near futility of an amalgam he described as mixing oil and water.  In Lugard’s own words: ”the north and south are like oil and water – they cannot mix”.
Now this is going to be a long chronicle of anecdotal records that I will leave to the readers for critical analyses.

The first 50 years (1914-1964):

1. Chief Richard Akinjide (SAN), a member of the Tafawa Balewa and Shagari governments – and as such, privy to intelligence reports and sensitive records – had this to say:

“In 1898, Lugard formed the West African Frontier Force initially with 2,000 soldiers, about 90 percent of them were from the North mainly from the Middle belt,, and that was the beginning of our problems. Anybody who wants to know the root cause of all the coups and our present problems, and who does not know the evolution of Nigeria would just be looking at the matter superficially. Our problems started from that time. And Lugard was what they called at that time imperialist.“

Chief Akinjide, an insider, continued: “Infact, the so-called Nigeria created in 1914 was a complete fraud. It was created not in the interest of Nigeria or Nigerians but in the interest of the British. And what were the structures created?

The structures created were as follows: Northern Nigeria was to represent England; Western Nigeria like Wales; Eastern Nigeria was to be like Scotland. In the British structure, England has permanent majority in the House of Commons. There was no way Wales can ever dominate England, neither can Scotland dominate Britain. But they are very shrewd. They would allow a Scottish man to become Prime Minister. They would allow a Welsh man to become Prime Minister in London but the fact remains that the actual power rested in England. That was what Lugard created in Nigeria, a permanent majority for the North“. “The population figure of the North is also a fraud. The analysis is as follows: If you look at the map of West Africa, starting from Mauritania to Cameroun and take a population of each country as you move from the coast to the Savannah, the population decreases. Or conversely, as you come from the Desert to the Coast, right from Mauritania to the Cameroun, the population increases. The only exception throughout that zone is Nigeria.“

“The British needed the Railway from the North to the Coast in the interest of British business. Amalgamation of the South (not of the people) became of crucial importance to British business interest. He said the North and the South should be amalgamated“.

“What is critical and important are the reasons Lugard gave in his dispatches. They are as follows:

He said the North is poor and they have no resources to run the protectorate of the North. That they have no access to the sea; that the South has resources and have educated people“

“When the amalgamation took effect, the British government sealed off the South from the North. And between 1914 and l960, that’s a period of 46 years, the British allowed minimum contact between the North and South because it was not in the British interest that the North be allowed to be polluted by the educated South.“

Obvious – the Willie Lynch Principle! Divide-and-Rule! Domination.

“I entered Parliament on December 12, 1959. When the North formed a political party, the northern leaders called it Northern Peoples Congress (NPC). They didn’t call it Nigeria Peoples Congress. That was in accordance with the dictum and policies of Lugard. When Aminu Kano formed his own party, it was called Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU) not Nigerian Progressive Union. Northern Peoples Congress was, back then, still exists in one form or another in 2011- not without a Northern-prefix!
Sometimes, you still read Northern Elements Political Forum! Indeed, these elements have not changed! 50 years later, we are still being confronted with a Northern Consensus Candidate.
Northern this, Northern that! Not Nigerian!”The Hausa-Fulani has no ideals, no ambitions save such as sensual in character. He is a fatalist, spendthrift and a gambler. He is gravely immoral and is seriously diseased that he is a menace to any community to which he seeks to attach himself”- Lord Lugard in a Letter to his colleague, Walter H. Lang on September 25, 1918.
How Federalism was destroyed in Nigeria
By REMI OYEYEMI Monday, April 2, 2012
It was Uthman Dan Fodio, a Fulani and great Islamic scholar who described “Conscience” as “an open wound” that could only be healed by “the truth.” Whatever served as the inspiration for this concept could not be anything other than awesome.The fact that this same Dan Fodio is the great grandfather of Sir Ahmadu Bello, the late Sultan of Sokoto and Premier of Northern Region, the man who have played a prominent role in the Nigerian vicissitudes makes it highly imperative that we all open our “consciences” and allow “the truth” to heal them, if Nigeria must be saved.It is important that Nigeria returns to true Federalism if it must survive. In this era when there is clamour for the Sovereign National Conference (SNC), it is important that we try to look back in History and examine how our Federalism was unmade. This is because as the Spanish born American Essayist George Santayana once contended, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” In this venture, all of us, regardless of our ethnic background must allow “the truth” to nurture and heal our “consciences” for the sake of our collective survival as a country.The Nigerian Federalism was unmade via two fronts: (1) Structural or Political and (2) Fiscal or Financial In 1952, Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sultan of Sokoto and the leader of the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) made the following request to the Nigerian Colonial Seceretary, Mr. Oliver Lyttleton:“If you want us (the North) to be part of this Nigeria you have in mind, then we want 50% of the membership of the National Assembly.”It would be recalled that as a result of the elections of 1954, there were 162 seats in the Nigerian National Assembly.
Out of this, the South had 83 seats (51.23%) and the North had 79 seats (48.76%), including the Yoruba people of Kwara. This means that if the Kwara people were not lumped with the North, they would still have less number of seats than 79, since this was based on population.This shows that the South of Nigeria has always been more populous than the North of Nigeria. But Sultan Bello, as evident from this 1952 request, has a different idea. If one considers his aristocratic background, one would have an understanding of his fear of “pure” democracy. Aristocracy is “the government of a country by a small group of people especially a hereditary nobility” which is “a group believed to be superior to all others of the same kind.”Thus for the Sultan to seek to dominate by any means necessary, would seem natural to him.In 1957, he refused the independence of Nigeria because he insisted the North was not ready. But the North was ready when he got what he wanted, and more, before Nigerian Independence in 1960. The British overlords, in order to assuage Sultan Bello’s fears and put Nigeria in his control, created in 1959, 312 seats for the Nigerian National Assembly without any election or new Census. Out of this 312, the North was allocated 174 and the South 138 in the anticipation of the Parliamentary Political System being put in place for Nigeria’s independence. Sultan Bello asked for 50% of the seats in the National Assembly, he got 55.7%. Suddenly, an apartheid system was put in place as the majority South, became the minority and the minority North became the majority.This is where the future of Nigeria was unmade, and the seed for the destruction of the Nigerian Federalism was sowed. This development gave unburnished confidence to Sultan Bello who declared on October 12, 1960, in an interview with The Parrot, just days after independence the following words: “This New Nation called Nigeria, should be an estate of our great grand father, Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We use the minorities in the North as willing tools, and the South, as conquered territory and never allow them to rule over us, and never allow them to have control over their future.”With Alhaji Tafawa Balewa firmly in charge in Lagos, Sir Bello’s confidence became ebullient. To him Chief Obafemi Awolowo has been a thorn in his flesh politically, having mainatained an effective opposition to the feudalisation of Nigeria. Earlier in 1959, he had vowed to make Chief Awolowo pay dearly for forcing him to canvass for the votes of his Northern people. Awolowo had to be caged. Thus in the Daily Times of May 3, 1961, Sir Bello said the following:“I’m set and fully armed, to conquer the Action Group, AG, in the same ruthless manner as my grandfather conquered Alkalawa, a town in Sokoto province, during the last century.” In May 1962, twelve months after this statement, the NPC Prime Minister of Nigeria, Tafawa Balewa, acting on instructions from Sultan Bello moved a motion to Declare A State of Emergency in Western Region. Below is an excerpt of Chief Awolowo’s contribution opposing the motion of Prime Minister Balewa on May 29, 1962:“Not long ago after independence, there was rioting of a most severe nature in the Tiv Division of Northern Nigeria. Several lives were lost, several properties were destroyed, there was arson and a host of other crimes were committed. At that time, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa was the Prime Minister as he is today. He did not think it fit to call this parliament to declare a state of public emergency in the Northern Region. Also in Okrika – there was widespread rioting in Okrika; again, several lives and properties were lost. I understand that this widespread rioting in Okrika occurred twice in the Eastern Region. The Prime Minister and the cabinet did not think it fit on that occasion to declare a state of public emergency in the Eastern Region.“But, because the Action Group is pursuing the normal democratic processes as laid down in our constitution to oust someone who happens to be a very close friend of the Prime Minister, and also because the AG is looked upon as a moral foe to the NPC, this very far-reaching provision of our constitution is now being invoked, …..It is doing violence to our constitution and doing violence to the construction of words to suggest that what happened in the Western House of Assembly amounts to a state of public emergency.”On July 16, 1962, exactly 46 days after Chief Awolowo moved this motion and fourteen months after Sir Bello made the statement of conquest of the AG, Chief Awolowo was arrested on the trumped up charges of Treasonable Felony. On November 2, 1962, Chief Awolowo and 28 other members of his party were put on trial. After a hearing lasting eleven months, he was sentenced (September 11, 1963) to ten years imprisonment. This effectively shut down the opposition to the unmaking of Nigerian Federalism which continued unabated.Thus, why Awolowo was incarcerated, the Northern Peoples Congress led Federal Government embarked on headcount. This exercise was headed by a Briton as Federal Census Officer, Mr. J. J. Warren. The exercise was later cancelled because it was unacceptable. Daniel Agbowu in his book “NIGERIA: The Truth” quoted from M. Crowder’s book, “Story of Nigeria” published in 1966 noting that “The 1962 figures were first questioned in the first place not by politicians but by the civil servant in charge of the Census.”The Census was re-conducted in 1963 but not without controversy. The figure released on February 24, 1964 is as follows:North: 29,809,000East: 12,394,000

West: 10,931,000

Midwest: 2,536,000

TOTAL: 55,670,000.

This was in contrast to the initial figure of over 60 million. Dr. Michael Okpara, Premier of Eastern Region described it as “worse than useless.” Chief Dennis Osadebey characterised it as the “stupendous joke of our age.” Chief S. L. Akintola, revelling in his supposed invulnerability having allied himself to the NPC, which mastermined the incarceration of Awolowo, gladly “accepted the census figures” and said “the figures were accurate.”

Dr. Nnamdi Azikwe, encumbered by his involvement in the Balewa government, could not effectively artculate the anger of his people as he pleaded that “all should remain calm” because the Census controversy “might plunge the nation into disaster.” Chief Awolowo was meanwhile effectively out of circulation. Sultan Bello had come out smoking as he threatened that “he and his party were ready for a complete showdown” and “warned all Nigerians” that his “Government has accepted the published figures.” Tafawa Balewa ignored all the protestations and went ahead to distribute the seats in the National Assembly as follows:

North 168 53.8%,

East 69 21 %,

West (Lagos included) 61 19.6%,

Midwest 14 4.5%.

The Eastern Region Soilicitor General, Mr. D. O. Ibekwe “took out a writ in the Supreme Court to restrain the Federal Government from using the 1963 Census figures for delineation of the country.” But the Supreme Court said it had no jurisdiction over the case, thus the unmaking of Nigerian Federalism continued.

Crisis followed that action of 1964 by Tafawa Balawa. In the West, the people took their destiny in their hands to confront the government of S. L. Akintola in an episode ingloriously referred to as “wet e.” The Tiv Riots, simmering since 1960 also came to a head in 1964 in what was called “nande nande” (burning burning) and “atem ityough” (head breaking). The whole country went up in flames which unfortunately, consumed the main actors, Sir Ahmadu Bello, Sir Tafawa Balewa and Chief S. L. Akintola, as the Military ascended the political pedestal to continue the serial rigging of Nigeria’s Federalism.

As at the time the First Republic went up in flames in 1966, there were different constitutions for each region and Nigeria. Each region has its own High Commissioner in London. What does this mean? It meant that every region was in control of its destiny. Most historical analysts believed that General Aguiyi Ironsi who took over the reign of power from the uncoordinated plotters of the coup was the first leader who actually practicalised Unitarism of the Nigerian political space, at least officially.

Reasons for this should not be difficult to decipher given the chaos that ended the First Republic. But this particular act coupled with the fact that in the January 15, 1966 coup led by mainly Igbo officers, Sultan Ahmadu Bello, Alhaji Tafawa Balewa (both Fulani) and Chief S. L. A. Akintola (Yoruba) were killed. But this was reportedly an excuse for the July 25, 1966 coup led by Murtala Mohammed that eventually saw the installation of Lt. Colonel Yakubu Gowon as the military Head of State.

If the Northern soldiers abhored Unitarism, part of the reason they had allegedly staged a vengeance coup, one would have thought that things would have been different on taking power. But alas, that was not the case. The Aburi Agreement meant to calm the nerves after the 1966 pogrom that would have guaranteed each region the control of its own destiny was violated by the North led Federal Government which went ahead to break Nigeria into twelve states. One region, the North ended up with six states. The three other regions ended up with 6 states in yet another rigging of Nigeria. And then there was the Civil War and the unmaking of Nigerian Fiscal Federalism commenced in earnest.

The Constitution establishing Nigeria stipulated 50% derivation “in respect of any Mineral extracted from that region.” Sub-sections 1,2 3,4 and 5 of the Constitution explained this in detail. But this would not deter the rigging of Nigeria as Yakubu Gowon unilaterally took off 5% oil receipt of the Niger Delta leaving them with 45%. He then proceeded with another Census in 1973. At first, Gowon came out with a total of 79,758,969. The six states of the North got 51 million while the Southern six states were given barely 28,758,969.

“This meant that the population of the North had jumped from 53.6% in 1963/64 to 63.8 in 1973/74 census. The Southern population had dwindled to 36.2% from 46.4%….” The Chairman of the census board late Sir Adetokunbo Ademola said “the figures published by Gowon were not my making.” Chief Obafemi Awolowo, now out of incarceration called the 1973 census a “barren exercise..”

To appreciate the extent of the rigging of the census figures, a comparative analysis of the figures alloted to the North of Nigeria showed that Niger Republic with 1,266,700sq km in land space in the desert has 5,013,966 population in 1973. Chad with 1,259,200 sq km of space had 4,011,856 population in 1973. But the North of Nigeria sharing boundaries with Chad and Niger Republic and with 679,534 sq km of space had 51million! The 1990/91 Census gave the North 47,261,959. Nothing points more to rigging when you look at the 1973 figures of 51 million and 1990 figure of over 47 million. There is no scientific explanation for the reduced difference of almost 4 million.

The Northerners rigged the population in favour of the North and used it as a basis to create States and local governments to the North’s advantage as ameans to siphoning resources to the disadvantage of the South. The Northern Military rulers who created states made sure that the North always had more states than the South as the table below shows:

At the risk of stating the obvious, it is an open seceret that the North has 64 more local governments than the entire South – North 419 LGs to South’s 355. What is obvious is the careless abandon with which money is allocated to the states and local governments of the North such that the North takes home 21/2 times what the former Eastern Region took, and 3 to 4 times what the Western Region took and at times, as much as 10 times what the former Mid-Western Region took.

According to “Nigeria: The Truth,” since 1980 when the Federation Account was introduced before the 13% derivation was resuscitated, the take home of each region in percentage of the total accrued money is as follows:

North 54%

East 22%

West 18%

Midwest 6%

Not many Nigerians are aware that the Northern Region paid custom duties to the Western Region until 1976, when Murtala Mohammed took over the reins of Government. Or that as at 1975 when Murtala Mohammend overthrew the Yakubu Gowon administration, the Niger Delta enjoyed 45% rents and royalties? Murtala Mohammed slashed it to 20% (Decree No. 6 of 1975) to assuage the Northern States, before Olusegun Obasanjo, through the Aboyade Technical Commission which recommended the removal of the remaining 20% of the rents and royalties, finally nailed the coffin of the Southern States without any protest from the people of the Niger Delta or other parts of the South.

Since then the North has been having advantages in appointments and resource distribution and have been robbing Peter to pay Paul. Now that the call for Sovereign National Conference is increasing, it is important that Nigerians isolate where the country went off the track and seek ways to retrace their steps as a way of moving forward. The way to go include but not limited to the following: Install True Federalism and allow each region to have its own constitution according to the Principles of Self Determination;

This will put an end to the apartheid system where the minority North is lording it over the majority South.;

This will end the injustice against the South, the goose laying the eggs being deprived of appropriate entitlements to its resources; Allow a minimum of 45% derivation if we cannot go back to the old 50%;

Allow state or regional police force and dismantle the Nigeria Police Force;

Decentralise the Nigerian Armed Forces and allow each region to manage its own defence;

Decentralise power generation; and Let each Region or zone be able to enunciate its own economic plan without the Central Bank being able to overrule them.

EXCERPTS FROM HAROLD SMITH’S CONFESSIONS BEFORE HE DIED 2 YEARS AGO

‘‘Our agenda was to completely exploit Africa. Nigeria was my duty post. When we assessed Nigeria, this was what we found in the southern region; strength, intelligence, determination to succeed, well established history, complex but focused life style, great hope and aspirations… the East is good in business and technology, the west is good in administration and commerce, law and medicine, but it was a pity we planned our agenda to give power “at all cost” to the northerner. They seemed to be submissive and silly of a kind. Our mission was accomplished by destroying the opposition at all fronts. The west led in the fight for the independence, and was punished for asking for freedom. They will not rule Nigeria! Harold Smith confessed that the Census results were announced before they were counted. Despite seeing vast land with no human but cattle in the north, we still gave the north 55 million instead of 32 Million. This was to be used to maintain their majority votes and future power bid. He stated that the West without Lagos was the most populous in Nigeria at that time but we ignored that. The north was seriously encouraged to go into the military. According to him, they believe that the south may attend western education, but future leaders will always come from military background. Their traditional rulers were to be made influential and super human. The northerners were given accelerated promotions both in the military and civil service to justify their superiority over the south. Everything was to work against the south. We truncated their good plan for their future. “I was very sorry for the A.G; it was a great party too much for African standard. We planned to destroy Awolowo and Azikwe well, the west and the east and sowed a seed of discord among them”. We tricked Azikwe into accepting to be president having known that Balewa will be the main man with power. Awolowo has to go to jail to cripple his genius plans for a greater Nigeria. ‘’Looking at the northern leaders now , If they have any agenda in Nigeria at all, sadly it is only for the north, and nothing for Nigeria….’’ http://haroldsmithmemorial.wordpress.com/2011/01/05/legendary-harold-smith-speaks-about-nigeria/

“Many Hausa-Fulani told me that the North’s escalating poverty has resulted from its declining access to oil because of its loss of the presidency to Olusegun Obasanjo, a Southern Christian Yoruba, following the death of the Northern Muslim Kanuri, Sani Abacha. Their solution to Northern poverty was to recapture the federal government. This they did in the rigged elections of 2007 and the presidency of Umaru Yar’Adua. But, they lost it again when Yar’Adua died in May 2010 and the vice president, Goodluck Jonathan, a Christian Ijaw from Southern Nigeria, became president.” – John Campbell, Former US Ambassador to Nigeria.

http://www.cfr.org/nigeria/nigeria-dancing-brink/p22833?excerpt=1

BRITISH RIGGING HISTORY: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/b007tyz0

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007tyz0

NOTABLE ANECDOTES:

“The mistake of 1914 has come to light, and I should like it to go no further!” – Sir Ahmadu Bello, addressing the Congress in Lagos, March 1953 (Quoted by Frederick Forsythe in his book, Biafra)

‘Having abused us in the South, these very Southerners have decided to come over to the North to abuse us… We have therefore organized about a thousand men ready in the city to meet force with force…’ – Mallam Inua Wada, Kano Branch Secretary of the Northern People’s Congress, addressing a meeting of section heads of the Native administration during the imminent visit of a delegation of the Action Group to Kano, May 1953. (Quoted by Frederick Forsythe in his book, Biafra)

“Since 1914, the British Government has been trying to make Nigeria into one country, but the Nigerian people themselves are historically different in their backgrounds, in their religious beliefs and customs and do not show themselves any signs of willingness to unite … Nigerian unity is only a British invention” – Alhaji Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa who was reported by the TIME MAGAZINE of October 10, 1960 to have said there was no basis for Nigerian unity and it was only a wish of the British.

“The new nation called Nigeria should be an estate of our great grandfather Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We use the minorities in the North as willing tools and the South as a conquered territory and never allow them to rule over us and never allow them to have control over their future”. Sir Ahmadu Bello, Parrot Newspaper, Oct 12, 1960

“I’m set and fully armed, to conquer the Action Group, AG, in the same ruthless manner as my grandfather conquered Alkalawa, a town in Sokoto province, during the last century” Sir Ahmadu Bello gave an interview to the DAILY TIMES of May 3, 1961

“We do not want, Sir, our Southern Neighbours to interfere in our development… I should like to make it clear to you that if the British quitted Nigeria now at this stage, the Northern people would continue their interrupted conquest to the sea” – Mallam Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, 1947, During the Inauguration of the Richard’s Constitution. (Quoted by Frederick Forsythe in his book, Biafra)

Northern House Of Assembly Proceedings, February-March 1964

Below is an extract from the proceedings of the Northern Region House of Assembly between February and March 1964, less than four years after Nigeria’s independence from the British. I have nothing to add. Read and judge for yourself:

Mallam Muhammadu Mustapha Mande Gyan:
On the allocation of plots to Ibos or allocation of stalls, I would like to advise the Minister that these people know how to make money, and we do not know the way and manner of getting about this business. We do not want Ibos to be allocated with plots. I do not want them to be given plots…

Mallam Bashari Umaru:
I would like (you), as a Minister of Land and Survey, to revoke forthwith all Certificates of Occupancy from the hands of the Ibos resident in the Region… (Applause)

Mr. A. A. Agogede:
I’m very glad that we are in a Moslem country, and the government of Northern Nigeria allowed some few Christians in the region to enjoy themselves according to the belief of their religion, but building of hotels should be taken away from the Igbos, and even if we find some Christians who are interested in building hotels and do not have money to do so, the government should aid them, instead of allowing Ibos to continue with their hotels.

Dr. Iya Abubakar (Special Member, Lecturer, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria):
I am one of the strong believers in Nigerian unity, and I have hoped for our having a united Nigeria, but certainly if the present state of affairs continues, I hope the government will investigate first the desirability and secondly the possibility of extending Northernisation policy to the petty traders. (Applause)

Mallam Mukhtar Bello:
I would like to say something very important, that the Minister should take my appeal to the Federal Government about the Igbos in the post office. I wish the numbers of these Igbos be reduced…. There are too many of them in the North. They are like sardines and 1 think they are just too dangerous to the Region.

Mallam Ibrahim Musa:
Mr. Chairman, Sir. Well first and foremost, what I have to say before this Hon. House is that we should send a delegation to meet our Hon. Premier to move a motion in this very Budget Session that all the Ibos working in the Civil Service of Northern Nigeria, including the native authorities, whether they are contractors or not, should be repatriated at once…

Mallam Bashari Umaru:
There should be no contracts either from the government, native authorities, or private enterprises given to Ibo contractors (Government Bench: Good talk and shouts of “Fire the Southerners”). Again, Mr. Chairman, the foreign firms too should be given time limit to replace all Ibo in their firms by some other people.

The Premier (Alhaji the Hon. Sir Ahmadu Bello, K.B.E., Sardauna of Sokoto):
It is my most earnest desire that every post in the region, however small it is, be filled by a Northerner (Applause)

Alhaji Usman Liman:
What brought the Ibos into this region? They were here since the colonial days. Had it not been for the colonial rule, there would hardly have been any Ibo in this region. Now that there is no colonial rule, the Ibos should go back to their region. There should be no hesitation about the matter. Mr. Chairman, North is for Northerners, East for Easterners, West for Westerners, and the Federation is for us all. (Applause)

The Minister of Land and Survey (Alhaji the Hon. Ibrahim Musa Cashash, O.B.E.):
Mr. Chairman. Sir, I do not like to take up much of the time of this House in making explanations, but I would like to assure members that having heard their demands about Ibos holding land in Northern Nigeria, my ministry will do all it can to see that the demands of members are met. How to do this, when to do it, al1 these should not be disclosed. In due course, you will all see what will happen. (Applause)

Culled from M. O. Onyenakeya, Igbos in Nigerian Politics, pp.30-32

NORTHERNISATION POLICY AGAINST OTHER Nigerians : Ahmadu Bellohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&client=mv-google&v=8y1Zpk4DrlA&feature=share&nomobile=1

Chief Ladoke Akintola 1965 Campaign Speech (Part 3 of 3)

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk83xIRwI2o

The second 50 years (1964-2014):

The foregoing precipitated all sorts of crises which eventually chrysalized into a military coup and 13 straight years of military rule (1966-1979).

The military rule continued uninterrupted for another 16 straight years (1983-1999)

During this period, as reported by Remi Oyeyemi (above), the structure of Nigeria was tweaked and tinkered with, to skew things more in favour of the north.

Please note: The South had 3 regions before the coup of 1966, to the north’s one. Western, Midwestern and Eastern Regions.

Aburi accord is as follows:

  • “Members agree that the legislative and executive authority of the Federal Military Government should remain in the Supreme Military Council, to which any decision affecting the whole country shall be referred for determination provided that where it is possible for a meeting to be held the matter requiring determination must be referred to military governors for their comment and concurrence.
  • Specifically, the council agreed that appointments to senior ranks in the police, diplomatic, and consular services as well as appointment to superscale posts in the federal civil service and the equivalent posts in the statutory corporation must be approved by the Supreme Military Council.
  • The regional members felt that all the decrees passed since January 15, 1966, and which detracted from previous powers and positions of regional governments, should be repealed if mutual confidence is to be restored.

The following are the delegates at the Aburi Conference:

Others as follows:

  • N. Akpan Secretary to the Military Governor-East
  • Alhaji Ali Akilu Secretary to the Military Governor-North
  • D. Lawani Under Secretary, Military Governor’s Office-Mid-West.
  • P. Odumosu Secretary to the Military Governor-West
  • S. Akenzua Permanent Under-Secretary-Federal Cabinet Office

In response to the accord, the federal government promulgated Decree No. 8, which was mainly an embodiment of the accord. The accord finally broke down because of differences of interpretation on both sides. This led to the outbreak of Nigerian Civil War. http://www.dawodu.com/aburi4.htm

PREAMBLE:The Fulani’s fear of Uthman Dan Fodio’s dream
Posted: March 28, 2010 – 01:00
http://saharareporters.com/article/fulani’s-fear-uthman-dan-fodio’s-dream
“The Hausa-Fulani has no ideals, no ambitions save such as sensual in character. He is a fatalist, spendthrift and a gambler. He is gravely immoral and is seriously diseased that he is a menace to any community to which he seeks to attach himself”- Lord Lugard in a Letter to his colleague, Walter H. Lang on September 25, 1918.
“Under the circumstances of what has been happening in Plateau State, some people just have to die……Any society that refuses to be just and fair shall become a jungle where only jungle justice shall operate……… Indeed, majority of our killings were carried out in areas where there was strong government presence.”
Mallam Sale Bayero, Fulani leader and secretary Sultan’s Farmer/Cattle Rearers Conflict Committee boasting as he justified the massacre of the Birom people while protesting the arrest of the Fulani murderers in Plateau State of Nigeria, quoted in THE SUN NEWS of Friday, March 12, 2010

Some time towards the middle of the second decade of the 1800s (1815 AD or thereabout), Uthman Dan Fodio was reported to have had a scary dream about his Sultanate empire that he had just built. This dream was said to have saddened him that the empire he had spilled so much blood to build would only lasted 200 years. As a courageous warrior that he was, Dan Fodio was reported to have summoned the will and interpret the dream to make this prediction about the future of his Empire.

According to informed sources as reported by Adewale Adeoye in The Nation of March 14, 2010, this fear of the realization of Dan Fodio’s dream was what informed the hurried movement of the Capital of Nigeria from Lagos to Abuja. The report said inter alia:

“The source hinted that in the 1970s, Northern leaders of Fulani extraction had met and resolved that the capital of Nigeria be moved from Lagos to Abuja, in anticipation of the prophecy of late Uthman Dan Fodio. He said the meeting was
propelled by the dream the then Sultan of Sokoto had that he saw his offsprings, in years to come, being requested to obtain visa permits before entering the Southern part of the country….”

There are a number of deductions that could be made from the above:

a) That the entire Nigeria was and is still regarded as part of the Sultanate Empire of Uthman Dan Fodio.
b) That this is why the Fulani have been exuding this arrogant attitude permeated with the “BORN TO RULE” mentality.
c) That this is why they have always ruled Nigeria as if we are in the middle ages and consider the wealth of Nigeria as theirs to dispense as they see fit.
d) That the recent liberation struggles in Birom, Niger Delta, and the rest of the South, west or east is being seen as the beginning of the end of the Sultanate Empire by the Fulani people
e) That the Fulani people have been scheming and preparing to get ready for when they would leave or be chased out of Nigeria.

It is this writer’s view that there is nothing wrong if the Fulani have to pull out of Nigeria to sustain and maintain the remnant of their Sultanate Empire. It would definitely serve all concerned very well. But this writer is not convinced that the Fulani would let go very easily, regardless of their palpitation about the dreams of Uthman Dan Fodio. They are going to fight hard. Anyone familiar with their trickery and how they subdued all the fledgling Hausa States one after the other, using Hausa masses against their kings would agree with this writer.

To this extent, I disagree with Lord Lugard that the Fulani (let us leave the Hausa ethnic nationality out for now), “has no ambition.” The Fulani has ambitions and great ones at that. The Fulani ambition is to always rule others whether they (Fulani) have the capacity to do so or not. The Fulani liked and still likes his empires, at least that of Uthman Dan Fodio had been in place before Lord Lugard ever was born.

It is this inherent ambition that forced the Fulani to develop the methodology to use religion to mobilize the Hausa critical mass against their own Hausa rulers and replaced them with blue-blooded turban-carrying Fulani rulers as Emirs across what used to be Hausa kingdoms. As time goes on, the Fulani sought ways to modernize its means of extending the frontiers of the Sultanate and refined its tool that was used against the Hausa Kingdoms in preparation for the conquest of the ethnic nationalities in Nigeria.

What the Fulani came up with was a different brand of what they did to the Hausa kings and empires. The Fulani concluded that because of cultural and religious factors, it would not be easy to use the critical mass of other ethnic nationalities in Nigeria to be able to supplant the leaders of these ethnic nationalities. So, the Fulani to sustain its ambition to rule and dominate, cultivated corrupt satellites in every ethnic nationality in Nigeria while politically annihilating the true leaders of other ethnic nationalities.

In 1957, during the heated battles for self government and independence, Sir Ahmadu Bello referred to Nigeria as “The mistake of 1914.” To correct this “mistake” a meticulous plan to dominate the future Nigerian Armed Forces was surreptitiously embarked upon while the British was helping out on the political front manufacturing Parliamentary seats for the North against the South of Nigeria. Thus, barely six months after independence, Sir Ahmadu Bello was able to say with confidence in the Daily Times of May 3, 1961, the following:

“I’m set and fully armed, to conquer the Action Group, AG, in the same ruthless manner as my grandfather conquered Alkalawa, a town in Sokoto province, during the last century.”

The writer would like readers to pay due attention to the words used by Sir. Bello, in this quote. He used the word “conquer” not negotiate. Ahmadu Bello executed this desired conquest of the West as he had planned. Though, it backfired temporarily as it consumed him a number of years later, but the Fulani sentries in the Caliphate Armed Forces euphemized as the Nigerian Armed Forces along with its surviving civilian wing have adopted Sir. Ahmadu Bello’s method of propping up political, economic and religious satellites in all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria to be able to maintain control from Abuja, Sokoto and or Gobir, the birthplace of Uthman Dan Fodio.

It would be alright, if the Fulani could live with others as others are willing and prepared to live with them in Nigeria and other parts of West Africa, at least. In Nigeria, there has been more than 100years of evidence that various ethnic Nationalities have accommodated, loved respected and cared for the Fulani in their midst. There are abundant evidence that the Fulani have been treated as fellow human beings and accorded the same rights that the host have always enjoyed.

But it is very unfortunate that the Fulani has not had the same “live and let live” approach to other ethnic Nationalities in Nigeria. The Fulani concept of living is that others have to die, so that the Fulani may live. As far as the Fulani are concerned, other peoples of other ethnic nationalities are second rate slaves to be used, dumped, maimed, raped or killed for the good of the Fulani man. The Fulani see Nigeria as his great grandfather’s inheritance to be toyed with as he wishes and as he wants. This attitude of Fulani makes him believe that he has to rule wherever he is, regardless of his comparative intelligence and capability to that of his host among other reasons.

Presenting a paper reviewing Paul M. Lewis’ book Ethnologue: Languages of the World, (16th Edition), to a study group in Philadelphia recently, Professor Wola Awoyale, a linguist at the University of Pennsylvania noted that the Fulani are recent immigrants in Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Benin Republic, Guinea, Senegal, Niger, Mali and Sudan. The Fulani symbol is turban, flag, alukimba, mosque and book. The Fulani are “a very creative” people who are often very “tight-lipped, silent and secretive” in their approach. They are very “mistrusting, calculating and patient.”

The Fulani are described as “cold blooded and ideological.” They are “ascetic, reclusive and tough-minded.” The Fulani places premium on the role of the mosque in its culture and this is why in all of Nigeria, a Fulani would not be a part of Jamaa (the congregation) where another man of different ethnic stock is leading muslims in prayers.

The Fulani language Fulfude with its variations in Fulah, Pulaar and or Pular is very highly priced. It is their weapon to discuss in secrecy and manipulate and carry out their machinations. The Fulani will freely learn the languages of others as a means of infiltrating them for economic, political and religious advantages while rarely speaking Fulfulde in the presence of others.

In an interview by The Nation, of Baba Oluwide, a former economic consultant to the United Nations (UN), it was reported inter alia:

“To him,(Baba Oluwide) the frequent clashes ‘reflects a reawakening of consciousness among nationalities which territories were forcefully taken by the Fulani’ adding that it also ‘signifies the collapse of the Fulani Empire.’ He said the ‘main cause of the downfall of the Fulani Empire’ was the defect inherent in their political and social perspectives which he says celebrates lack of tolerance for diverse culture and a resentment of pluralism of ideas.”

This writer, in disagreeing with the interviewee, would not be so swift to sing the dirge of the Sokoto Caliphate or the Sultanate. While one may agree that there is “a reawakening of consciousness among nationalities which territories were forcefully taken by Fulani,” there is still the need for the ethnic Nationalities in Nigeria to remain vigilant. It is one’s view that the battle to overthrow the yoke of the Fulani political imperialism/neo-colonialism, economic exploitation and religious extremism is just about to begin.

While it may be true that the Fulani is being haunted by the dream of Uthman Dan Fodio and are making preparations for the D-Day when they would leave Nigeria or chased out, it would amount to political suicide for the oppressed and enslaved ethnic nationalities in Nigeria to go to sleep, waiting for the time when the Fulani would voluntarily leave Nigeria. There may be eventual negotiations, but this writer doubts it giving the characteristics of a Fulani man.

It is one’s view that freedom is not cheap and neither is it free. There is always a price to pay for one’s freedom. The Fulani is willing to loot, maim, and kill to hold on to its empire. This suggests that to take it from them, all the ethnic nationalities have to be prepared for every eventuality just in case words and negotiations would not solve the problem.

It would be recalled that the Fulani embarked on ethnic cleansing of the Jukun ethnic nationality in Taraba State in the 1990s. The Fulani are vociferously claiming the ownership of Idi-Araba and yelled “barao, barao, barao” meaning “thief, thief, thief” on the then Governor of Lagos State, Bola Tinubu in his own State. The Fulani started war on traditionalists in Shagamu in Ogun State over the celebration of Oro Festival. The Fulani have tried to reduce the Tiv’s population by extermination during the First Republic. The Fulani have tried to emasculate the Katafs in Kaduna before. The Fulani tried to cleanse Zakibiam of non-Fulani blood. The Fulani have been killing owners of the land in Iseyin and Shaki in Oyo State. Media reports noted that scores of owners of the lands in Oyo were left “dead, maimed or raped.” The Fulani are determined to wipe out the Birom people of Plateau from their ancestral lands. The Fulani has just recently killed a policeman in Ekiti State after wounding the owners of the land. The Fulani has an Emir of Ilorin, a Yoruba town. The Fulani is determined to have an Emir of Jos and possibly Enugu too, very soon

The Nation, in its report of March 14,2010 also noted the following:

“In many West African countries, clashes between nomadic Fulani and indigenous communities are well known underlining the fact that the challenge is a sub-regional phenomenon. In Cameroon, Ghana, Mali, Togo and Niger, frequent clashes between nomadic Fulani and land owners constitute a major security problem for national and regional governments. In the Chad basin, clashes between Fulani and Shua Arabs have led to thousands of deaths, reliable sources claim. Many of the clashes were between indigenous communities and Fulani herdsmen accused of trespassing on native lands and in many cases, attempting to take over the lands by force of arms.”

This shows that the Fulani has a character that is antithetical to the hopes and yearnings of other ethnic nationalities in Nigeria and around West African sub-continent. They are used to taking things that do not belong to them by force. Exploiting the oil of the Niger Delta in the way and manner it had been for this long is not out of character for the Fulani. Spending the national resources to which they contribute next to nothing like a drunken “gambler” is part of the Fulani nature. The Fulani has no capacity to be compassionate where his interests are at stake. Thus the murdering of a Ken Saro Wiwa here and a Dele Giwa there, or another Akaluka here and Oluwatosin there means nothing to the Fulani. It is just a way of life.

The essence of bringing this to the attention of the world, especially the ethnic nationalities in the bondage called Nigeria is to let them know what they are engaged with in the struggles to be free and have self determination. The Fulani is not prepared to negotiate if he is going to lose out. He will fight very ruthlessly.

The only language the Fulani understands is war and conquest. All you need to do is just listen to Mallam Sale Bayero in the quote above. Listen to the post-humous voice of Ahmadu Bello echoing from the grave as he uses the words “ruthless” and “conquer” in speaking about his supposed fellow countrymen. Listen to Mallam Bala Garuba in the West African Pilot newpaper speaking of “conquest” of his supposed countrymen. Listen to Mallam Falalu Bello (MD, Unity Bank of Nigeria) threatening “there will be no real peace in this country moving forward,” because he feels the Fulani has no control over the resources and means of others. Listen to Balarabe Musa making a case for permanent rulership of Nigeria by the Fulani. Listen to the Bala Usman of this world as to why no one of other ethnic nationality should be allowed to rule Nigeria. Listen to the silent yells of Maitama Sule making the same case. Yes, the nightmare of Dan Fodio’s dream may hang like a noose around the Fulani’s neck, but the Fulani would never give up without a fight.

The Hausa people are still wondering how they have become so slavish to the Fulani. They are still wondering how their very valuable heritage has been polluted and dumped for that of the Fulani settlers. The Hausa are still wondering how the great histories of their forefathers have been supplanted by that of the Fulani to whom they have shown great love and hospitality.

Every ethnic Nationality in Nigeria needs to be aware that the Hausa people are very confused right now. Some of their elites have been incorporated by the scheming and secretive Fulani. The Fulani are very few in numbers and they have brainwashed the Hausa people to believe that their (Hausa) destinies are tied together with that of the Fulani because of Islam. The Fulani use the Hausa numbers as a buffer to perpetrate Fulani evils in Hausa name. What they have done to Hausa people is to make them believe in the Fulani as the path finders for them (Hausa).

Now, it is the Hausa who is used to fight the Fulani fights and battles. This is what Sir. Ahmadu Bello, taking a page off the book of his Fulani great grand father, Uthman Dan Fodio, has also done with other minority groups in the North of Nigeria, using them as tools for the Fulani conquest of Nigeria. As pointed out above, this trick has been extended to all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria and as such one could find among them corrupt leaders who hold allegiance to the Sultanate rather than their peoples.

This writer has his doubts if the Hausa people would ever wake up. Even, if and when they wake up, the benefits of greed and the unabated appropriation of resources for which they have never labored out of the Niger Delta and other parts of Nigeria would still guarantee the Hausa – Fulani cooperation.

The minority ethnic nationalities in the North are waking up. They are realizing that they are slaves in their own lands. They are just realizing that they have been fighting the battles of Fulani to their own and their peoples’ detriment. They have just realized that cows are much more treasured by the Fulani than the Birom mothers, Tiv wives, Jukun sisters, Igala children, Nupe brothers and Kataf fathers.

The Fulani is a fiercely ambitious man, contrary to what Lord Lugard is trying to make us believe. The Fulani would plunder, loot, rape, maim and kill in pursuit of this ambition. The Fulani would take advantage of the weaknesses of his host and supplant him and appropriate his wealth and means. The Fulani for the last 200 hundred years has been at loggerhead with every known hospitable host of his, not just in Nigeria but in West African sub region. The Fulani ambitions are intolerant of the existence and well being of others. This is where one could agree with Lord Lugard – that the Fulani is “seriously diseased” and “a menace to any community to which he seeks to attach himself.”

The ethnic nationalities in all of Nigeria still stand a good chance to be free. That chance would fizzle and dissipate without standing firm, strong and willing to make the necessary sacrifice that would be required. It is time to repel the Fulani imperialism and or neo-colonialism. It is time to reclaim our freedom and rights. It is time to seek any means necessary to be free from the bondage called Nigeria. Cows could not, should not, would not and must not be more important than our daughters and sons, brothers and sisters as well as our mothers and fathers.

…………………………………………………………………………………………..

FACT, apart from Jonathan, No one has ever RULED NIGERIA if he is not military or LOYAL to Hausa-Fulani and Hands power back to them (eg GOWON who was overthrown, and OBJ who handed over to SHAGARI AND UMYA). No southern CIVILIAN HAS EVER RULED Nigeria (Abiola would have been the first but he was murdered). AND NOTE: No coup by a non HAUSAFULANI has ever succeed without being quashed….ALL COUPS by HAUSA FULANI have ALWAYS succeeded…for lenghty years.

EXCERPTS FROM HAROLD SMITH’S CONFESSIONS: ”The north was seriously encouraged to go into the military. According to him, they believe that the south may attend western education, but future leaders will always come from military background. Their traditional rulers were to be made influential and super human. The northerners were given accelerated promotions both in the military and civil service to justify their superiority over the south. Everything was to work against the south”….

Alhaji Lawal Kaita a prominent member of the ACF did make the following statement in October of 2010; “anything short of a Northern President is tantamount to stealing our presidency. Jonathan has to go and he will go. Even if he uses incumbency powers to get his nomination on the platform of the PDP, he will be frustrated out” “The North is determined, if that happens, to make the country ungovernable for President Jonathan or any other Southerner who finds his way to the seat of power on the platform of the PDP against the principle of the party’s zoning policy.

A Northerner Must Emerge in 2015 Or Nigeria Will Divide- Lawal Kaita http://www.naijapundit.com/news/a-northerner-must-emerge-in-2015-or-nigeria-will-divide-lawal-kaita

Dissidents in parts of Northern Nigeria protest Jonathan candidature http://nigeriansabroadlive.com/dissidents-in-parts-of-northern-nigeria-protest-jonathan-candidature/ January 17, 2011

The long years of brainwashed/hypnotic upbringing the northern rabble have been exposed to, is another factor. They are used as human shields in their free-floating paranoia. Some of the Hausa Fulani elites may also be wary of Almajiris growing up from one of the new schools built by Jonathan, educated and fit for a new stratum of middlemanship. The Talakawa-Sarakuma social stratification system has really been the bane of socioeconomic development in the north…

SUMMARY OF ATTACKS AND CHRISTIAN LOSSES IN NORTHERN NIGERIA SINCE 1980
1. December 18th-20th 1980_ Kano, Kano State_ Islamic Revivalists (Maitatsine group) attacked Christians and burnt churches; over 4,000 Christians were killed and their properties worth millions of naira lost.
2. October 25th-30th 1982_ Kaduna, Kaduna State_ another Maitatsine riot; over 50 Christians estimated dead.
3. October 30th 1982_Kano, Kano State (Sabon Gari Municipality)_2 Churches burnt to ashes, 6 more destroyed.
4. December 26th-29th 1982_Maiduguri, Borno State_Maitatsine riot: over 100 Christians lost their lives and properties destroyed.
5. February 15th -2nd March 1984_ The Gongola State (Jimeta-Yola) _ The Maitatsine group attacked Christians; over 500 Christians were killed.
6. April 23rd-28th 1985_Then Bauchi State (Gombe)_Maitatsine uprising: more than 100 Christians lost their lives.
7. March 6th-12th 1987_ Kaduna State (Kafanchan, Kaduna, Zaria) & Katsina in Katsina State_ Muslim students attacked Christian students at College of Education in Kafanchan and Christians fought back. The fight later spread to other places as indicated here under location. More than 150 churches were burnt and over 25 Christians killed.
8. March 1988_Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna_ Kaduna State Government destroyed a Christian Chapel under construction. This led to religious uprising.
9. 1988_Kaduna State (ABU University Zaria)_Benson Omenka, final year student, killed by Muslim students during Students Union election. Christian students were also stoned, maimed and raped.
10. 1988_Bauchi State, Gombe_Religious in Bauchi State Secondary Schools, Muslim students attacked Christian Teachers and students in GSS Gombe, GTC Gombe and GSS Bauchi and other Secondary Schools in Bauchi State. Some of the Christian students were badly wounded.
11. April 20th-23rd 1991_Bauchi State, Bauchi_Fighting between Muslims and Christians; more than 200 people lost their lives and 700 churches and mosques were burnt.
12. October 14th-16th 1991_Kano State, Kano_The Reinhard Bonnke riots fighting between Muslims and Christians as Muslim activists rampaged and protested against a planned revival meeting during which a German Evangelist, Reinhard Bonnke, was expected to be the guest preacher.
13. October 1991_Plateau State_A young man from Anaguta was beaten to death on a field opposite University of Jos during election primaries of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP).
14. February 1992_Kano State_Many Christians were massacred and churches destroyed.
15. February 1992_Plateau State, Jos_A young Christian, married with one child, was beaten to death by Muslims as he was going home from an evening church meeting, at Yan Taya junction, Jos.
16. April 15th-16th 1992_Kaduna state, Zangon Kataf local Government Area_What was supposed to be a communal riot between Christians and Muslims and spread throughout Kaduna State. Hundreds of people lost their lives and buildings were burnt.
17. May 18th 1992_Kaduna, Zaria_Rev. Tacio Duniya of E.C.W.A, Rev. Musa Bakut and a host of others were murdered by Muslim fanatics.
18. April 12th 1994_Plateau State, Jos_Fighting between Muslims and Christians over the appointment of one Aminu Mato as chairman of the Caretaker Committee for Jos Local Government Area. 16 lives were lost and properties were destroyed.
19. 1999_Borno State_Religious riots as Borno State government mooted the idea of not allowing the teaching of Christian Religious Knowledge in Schools.
20. February 4th -22nd 2000_Kaduna State_Riots began after a Christian march opposing the implementation of Sharia law. Travellers were killed as they tried to escape from their vehicles. More than 1,000 people died in various clashes.
21. February. & May 2000_Kaduna State, Kaduna_Christians in Kaduna were attacked on two different occasions as Muslim fanatics protested against the delay in introduction of sharia in the state.
22. May 16th 2000_Kaduna_ Muslim youths destroyed ECWA in Kaduna only hours after peacekeeping troops left the area.
23. May 22nd 2000_Kaduna state_ Muslim youths torched the First Baptist Church and Christian homes, leading to retaliation by Christian youths. At least 11 people died and many others were injured in the incident.

24. May 25th 2000_Kaduna state_ Several days of violence over the introduction of Sharia led to the death of at least 150 people. Homes, shops and churches were also destroyed.
25. September 7th-9th, 2000_Gombe State_In Bambam, 25 people died as a result of clashes between Muslims and Christians due to possible implementation of Sharia. Property damaged was estimated in millions of Naira.
26. November 2000_ Kebbi State_Christians showing the Jesus film were warned not to continue showing the film.
27. June 2001_Jigawa State_15 churches and 14 Pastors’ residences were burned down in Gawaram. A similar attack on 11 churches occurred earlier in that year in hadejia.
28. 5th August 2001_Bauchi State_According to the Church of Christ in Nigeria (COCIN), Muslim mercenaries had been attacking Christians in the Tafawa Balewa and Bogoro areas on two occasions. The attacks left more than 100 dead and 3,000 refugees.
29. 7th-12th September 2001_Plateau State, Jos_Muslims attacked Christians. Properties were destroyed and people lost their lives.
30. September 7th-17th 2001_Kano State_Seven churches were demolished; six churches set ablaze by a mob. Fifty four churches given demolition notices and seventeen churches demolished by the Kano state government. The Governor stated that all churches in Shagari quarters of kano city were “illegal structures”, probably due to the religious conflict in Jos.
31. October 7th 2001_Kaduna State_Muslim youths attacked three churches and 10 Christian-owned shops with gas bombs, setting fire to the buildings.
32. October 14th-18th 2001_Kano State_As a result of Anti-American protests, 600 Christians were missing and another 350 were killed; at least five churches were burned during the resulting riots.
33. December 24th-25th 2001_Gombe State_A visit to Gombe State by the Israeli ambassador sparked a riot, at least 4 people were killed, 50 injured, and two churches damaged.
34. 2nd May 2002_Plateau State, Jos_Muslims attacked Christians. Properties were destroyed and people lost their lives.
35. May 2002_Zamfara State_The whereabouts of two Christians charged with apostasy, converting from Islam to Christianity, was unknown. Lawali Yakubu and Ali jafaru disappeared after a judge refused to sentence them to death.
36. May-June 2002_Niger State_At least 75 Christians were arrested for opposing the state’s Sharia law.
37. June 6th 2002_Katsina State_A Christian Police Officer in Katsina was clubbed to death by a mob of Muslims after being accused of trampling a Koran. The Police Officer had warned a Muslim preacher to stop inciting violence against Christians. Afraid of being arrested, the preacher fabricated the Koran story to provoke the crowd.
38. September, 2002_Kaduna State, Federal Government College Zaria_Muslim students fought against Christian students discovered tha a Christian was likely to win the position of Students Union President during a student election. Many were killed and several female students raped.
39. October 13th 2002_Kaduna, Zaria_A clash over a student election at the Federal College of Education in Zaria ended in the death of 20 Christian students.
40. November 20th-21st 2002_Kaduna State, Kadoka and Kano_Muslim mobs ransacked Thisday Newspaper’s Office and then began to attack Christian targets, damaging up to 20 churches. Over 200 people were killed and 1,200 injured in the attacks.
41. December 26th, 2002_Bauchi State_An armed Muslim mob attacked Christians concluding Christmas celebration. The Celestial Church of Christ and many Christian homes were burnt.
42. April 22nd 2003_Kano State_A pastor and 6 of his members were killed in a house fire which was believed to have been set by Muslim militants.
43. December, 2003_Plateau State, Rim_Christians killed, houses and churches destroyed, individuals injured and many other damages.
44. February 2004_Plateau State, Yelwa Shendam_47 Christians burnt in church with a lot of houses and properties destroyed.
45. April 2004_Kano State_Reprisal of Jos crisis: many Christians killed, houses and properties lost.
46. February 18th 2006_Maiduguri_56 churches burnt and 63 Christians killed in an orchestrated attack.
47. September 2006_Jigawa State_26 churches burnt.
48. September 28th 2007_Kano State, Tudun Wada_3 killed, 72 injured, 8 churches burnt.
49. December 2007_Bauchi, Yelwa_Ten Christians killed and 47 injured.
50. May 13th 2008_Bauchi State, Ningi, Tafawa Balewa_Six churches burnt and vandalized.
51. November 28th 2008_Plateau State_Over 100 Christians killed, 71 churches burnt, 1,647 families lost their homes, 535 businesses burnt.
52. December 2008_Sokoto_NCCF (NYSC) bus burnt.
53. February 21st 2009_Bauchi_19 people dead, 12 churches burnt, 50 Christian houses destroyed.
54. 29th July 2009_Borno, Bauchi and Adamawa States_A group called Boko Haram killed Christians who refused to accept Islam, burnt their churches and attacked security operatives.
55. 27th December 2009_Plateau State_Muslims burnt Baptist Church at Yelwa and stabbed some Christians on the streets of Jos.
56. 29th December 2009_Bauchi_A group called Kalikato attacked people in Bauchi, leaving 39 people dead and houses burnt.
57. 17th 21 January 2010_Plateau State_Muslims unleash destruction over 24 communities in Jos North, Jos South, Barkin ladi, Mangu, Pankshin and Dangi, claiming numerous lives and burning Christian homes and Churches including Bukuru Market.
58. 20th January 2010_Sokoto state_A Christian man was killed in retaliation over the incidence in Jos.
59. 22nd January 2010_Kaduna Sate_Muslims attack Christians at Mararraban Rido (close to NNPC depot).
60. 28th January-1st February 2010_Gombe State_Muslims burnt ECWA primary and secondary schools at Bolori, burnt houses belonging to Igbos at Duku, burnt Yoruba Hall at Jekadafari and also burnt two churches with one vandalized.

“There are people in power in certain parts of the country, leaders, who quite genuinely and authoritatively hate and cannot tolerate any religion outside their own,”

“When you combine that with the ambitions of a number of people who believe they are divinely endowed to rule the country and who… believe that their religion is
above whatever else binds the entire nation together, and somehow the power appears to slip from their hands, then they resort to the most extreme measures.

“Youths who have been indoctrinated right from infancy can be used, and who have been used, again and again to create mayhem in the country”

“Those who have created this faceless army have lost control.”

-Professor Wole Soyinka

FULANI HERDSMEN AND NIGERIANS : “Anyone, soldier or not that kills the Fulani takes a loan repayable one day no matter how long it takes.” – Nasir Ahmad El Rufai.
1. 33 feared dead as herdsmen, farmers clash in Benue http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/09/33-feared-dead-herdsmen-farmers-clash-benue/September 30th, 2013
2. Fulani herdsmen ravage Imo communities http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/08/fulani-herdsmen-ravage-imo-communities/ August 15th, 2013
3. Over 40 Killed in Renewed Nasarawa Attack, Articles | THISDAY LIVE http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/over-40-killed-in-renewed-nasarawa-attack/149651/#.UbHHTFEivlE.facebook June 7th, 2013
4. Villagers flee as Fulani herdsmen invade Plateau communityhttp://www.punchng.com/news/villagers-flee-as-fulani-herdsmen-invade-plateau-community/ June 3rd, 2013
5. Herdsmen massacre 17, several hundreds flee homes in Benue http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/06/herdsmen-massacre-17-several-hundreds-flee-homes-in-benue/ June 1st. 2013
6. Fulani/farmers clashes claim 300 lives in 5 months http://www.sundaytrust.com.ng/index.php/news/13160-fulani-farmers-clashes-claim-300-lives-in-5-months May 26th, 2013
7. Fulani herdsmen strike again, kill two, kidnap others in Benuehttp://dailypost.com.ng/2013/05/25/fulani-herdsmen-strike-again-kill-two-kidnap-others-in-benue/ May 25th, 2013
8. Gov. Gabriel Suswam of Benue on Wednesday alleged that some Fulani herdsmen attacked Agatu Local Government Area of the state, leaving “high casualties including women and children’’ .http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/05/many-killed-in-benue-herdsmen-attack-20-policemen-killed-in-nasarawa/ May 8th, 2013
9. Over 100 women, children and farmers killed in renewed Tiv/Fulani bloodbathhttp://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/05/over-100-women-children-and-farmers-killed-in-renewed-tivfulani-bloodbath/
10. Fulani herdsmen sack Imo community http://sunnewsonline.com/new/national/fulani-herdsmen-sack-imo-community/ April 23rd, 2013
11. 10 killed in Delta as villagers, herdsmen clash http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/04/10-killed-in-delta-as-villagers-herdsmen-clash/ April 15th, 2013
12. Horror: Fulani herdsmen murder, rape and destroy Ohaji/Egbema communityhttp://www.hoohaaonline.co/horror-fulani-herdsmen-murder-rape-and-destroy-ohajiegbema-community/ April 15th, 2013
13. Three killed, houses burnt as Fulani herdsmen attack Tiv farmers http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/04/three-killed-houses-burnt-as-fulani-herdsmen-attack-tiv-farmers/ April 9th, 2013
14. 5 killed in renewed Tiv/Fulani crisis http://www.sundaytrust.com.ng/index.php/news/12447-5-killed-in-renewed-tiv-fulani-crisis March 24th, 2013
15. 35 reported dead as Herdsmen Clash in Plateau State….March 21st, 2013http://www.punchng.com/news/35-villagers-killed-in-fresh-plateau-communal-clash/
16. Over 100 Beroms Killed By Fulani Militias – Lg Boss | 247 Nigeria http://247nigerianewsupdate.com/over-100-beroms-killed-by-fulani-militias-lg-boss/ March 21st, 2013
17. Hundreds Flee As Clash Between Herdsmen And Community Kills 2 In Deltahttp://www.channelstv.com/home/2013/02/20/hundreds-flee-as-clash-between-herdsmen-and-community-kills-2-in-delta/ 21 Feb, 2013
18. 30 killed, scores injured in Fulani herdsmen, Eggon farmers clash http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/02/30-killed-scores-injured-in-fulani-herdsmen-eggon-farmers-clash/ 08 Feb, 2013
19. Two die, thousands displaced as Fulani, Gwari clash in Abujahttp://www.punchng.com/business/two-die-thousands-displaced-as-fulani-gwari-clash-in-abuja/ Date Published 30 Dec, 2012
20. Save us from Fulani herdsmen, farmers plead http://t.co/B04L1pyI Date Published 02 Dec, 2012
21. Plateau: Gunmen shoot 12 Fulani herdsmen, kill 12 cows http://tribune.com.ng/index.php/news/51231-plateau-gunmen-shoot-12-fulani-herdsmen-kill-12-cows Date Published 21 Nov, 2012
22. Fulani Herdsmen Rapé Newlywed In Ogun http://www.informationnigeria.org/?p=36835 Date Published 21 Nov, 2012
23. Flash: 3 Dead As Hersdmen, Farmers Clash In Nasarawa http://t.co/PiAv6PZjDate Published 19 Oct, 2012
24. 30 feared dead in renewed Fulani/Tiv attack http://nigeriaindepth.com/30-feared-dead-in-renewed-fulanitiv-attack/ Date Published 17 Oct, 2012
25. How I was almost killed by Fulani herdsmen – Motorcyclist http://t.co/Nsah6DufDate Published 16 Oct, 2012
26. 2 killed in reprisal attack by Fulani in Plateau http://tribune.com.ng/index.php/front-page-news/46483-2-killed-in-reprisal-attack-by-fulani-in-plateauDate Published 24 Aug, 2012
27. Fear grips Enugu community as Fulani herdsmen kill 2 teenagershttp://dlvr.it/21P2yQ Date Published 18 Aug, 2012
28. Police arrests herdsmen with sub-machine guns http://www.businessdayonline.com/NG/index.php/news/284-breaking-news/42272-police-arrests-herdsmen-with-sub-machine-guns DATE PUBLISHED: 03/08/2012
29. Suspected Fulani herdsmen kill serving senator, state legislator in Plateauhttp://www.punchng.com/news/suspected-fulani-herdsmen-kill-serving-senator-state-legislator-in-plateau/ Date Published 08 July, 2012
30. Fulani herdsmen attack 9 villages in Plateau state http://www.channelstv.com/home/2012/07/07/fulani-herdsmen-attack-9-villages-in-plateau-state/ Date Published 07 July, 2012
31. Oyo to prevent recurrence of Fulani herdsmen, farmers’ clash http://nationalmirroronline.net/news/43744.html Date Published 29 June, 2012
32. Taraba: 13 fulani herdsmen killed in fresh tribal attacks http://www.ipaidabribenaija.com/index.php/latest-news/item/4551-taraba-13-fulani-herdsmen-killed-in-fresh-tribal-attacks Date Published 12 June, 2012
33. ‘Fulani herdsmen kill 75 Tiv farmers’ http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/47428-‘fulani-herdsmen-kill-75-tiv-farmers’.html Date Published 22 May, 2012
34. THE MENACE OF FULANI HERDSMEN http://www.tribune.com.ng/index.php/editorial/40782-the-menace-of-fulani-herdsmen Date Published 14 May, 2012
35. Potiskum attack: Fulani herdsmen give Jonathan ultimatum http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/45702-potisku-attack-fulani-herdsmen-give-jonathan-ultimatum.html Date Published 07 May, 2012
36. Thousands of Fulani herdsmen flee Benue for C’riverhttp://www.channelstv.com/home/2012/03/28/thousands-of-fulani-herdsmen-flee-benue-for-criver/ Date Published 28 May, 2012
37. Influx of Fulani herdsmen worries C’ River http://www.punchng.com/news/influx-of-fulani-herdsmen-worries-c-river/ Date Published 28 May, 2012
38. C’River to ‘repatriate’ Fulani herdsmen http://www.punchng.com/news/criver-to-repatriate-fulani-herdsmen/ Date Published 29 May, 2012
39. Plateau State: Herdsmen slaughter family of 7 http://pmnewsnigeria.com/2012/05/11/plateau-state-herdsmen-slaughter-family-of-7/ Date Published 11 May, 2012
40. Fulani Herdsmen Kill 13, Destroy 30 Houses In Plateau http://naijagists.com/fulani-herdsmen-kill-13-destroy-30-houses-in-plateau/ Date Published 03 May, 2012
41. Herdsmen block Abuja-Jos road, waylay passengers http://www.punchng.com/news/herdsmen-block-abuja-jos-road-waylay-passengers/ Date Published 07 May, 2012
42. One Killed, Several Injured in Fulani-Hausa Clash In Sokoto http://saharareporters.com/news-page/one-killed-several-injured-fulani-hausa-clash-sokoto Date Published 04 April, 2012
43. Ogun pledges grazing routes, patrols to curb herdsmen’s atrocities http://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/03/ogun-pledges-grazing-routes-patrols-to-curb-herdsmens-atrocities/ Date Published 26 March, 2012
44. Suspected Fulani herdsmen kill two policemen in Plateau statehttp://www.channelstv.com/home/2012/03/21/suspected-fulani-herdsmen-kill-two-policemen-in-plateau-state/ Date Published 21 March, 2012
45. Delta villagers protest attacks by Fulani herdsmen http://www.punchng.com/news/delta-villagers-protest-attacks-by-fulani-herdsmen/ Date Published 07 March, 2012
46. M-A-S-S-A-C-R-E-! Fulani herdsmen, Boko Haram kill 39 •13 villages sacked in Benue http://www.tribune.com.ng/index.php/front-page-news/37087-m-a-s-s-a-c-r-e–fulani-herdsmen-boko-haram-kill-39-13-villages-sacked-in-benue-20-feared-dead-on-akure-ilesa-expressway Date Published 06 March, 2012
47. Fulani Herdsmen Vs Ogun State Villagers At War http://www.nairaland.com/882080/fulani-herdsmen-vs-ogun-state/1 Date Published 29 February, 2012
48. 5000 Flee As Fulani Herdsmen Attack Benue And Nassarawahttp://www.nairaland.com/815595/5000-flee-fulani-herdsmen-attack Date Published 01 December, 2011
49. Herdsmen Kill 2, Molest Women In Imo http://www.nairaland.com/711381/herdsmen-kill-2-molestation-women/6 Date Published 12 July, 2011
50. Family of 8 killed in Jos midnight attack http://www.momentng.com/en/news/3762/family-of-8-killed-in-jos-midnight-attack.html Date Published 05 September, 2011
51. Fulani Herdsmen And Hausa Traders Clash At Golbin Bokahttp://www.nairaland.com/764634/fulani-herdsmen-hausa-traders-clash Date Published 21 September, 2011
52. Birom People’s Reprisal Attacks http://newsrescue.com/2011/09/birom-christians-eat-roasted-flesh-of-muslims-they-killed-in-jos-nigeria/#axzz203LOiZDEDate Published 29 September, 2011
53. Fulani Herdsmen kill 6 people in Plateau State http://www.elombah.com/index.php/templates/system/css/media/system/js/news/node/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4321%3Afulani-herdsmen-kill-6-people-in-plateau-state&catid=3%3Anewsflash Date Published 27 October, 2010
54. Herdsmen strike in Ekiti, kill police corporal, two villagers wounded http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-49367.html Date Published 21 March, 2010
55. HOW STRAY COWS CAUSED AIR MISHAP IN PORT HARCOURThttp://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/RiskManagement/cowcrazy.htmlDate Published 10 July, 2005
56. How Buhari Confronted Lam Adesina Over Death of Fulani http://www.naijapundit.com/news/how-buhari-confronted-lam-adesina-over-death-of-fulani

REVEALED: HOW BOKO HARAM OPERATES

*They Move Around Under the cover of darkness in the North East

*They wear our own Army and other military uniforms

*They bomb communication masts to reduce contact from whistle-blowers and victims alike

*They extort money and loyalty from communities they operate from, refusal may lead to beheading and murder

*They Shoot Civilians and bomb/burn buildings in their way when escaping from Superior firepower from the REAL NIGERIAN MILITARY

*They adopt the Quran as superior over the Nigerian constitution

*They are given moral and psychological support by the seeming indifference of notable, influential and significant people in the north (and even on social media)

*They franchise their activities with their kith and kin in the Sahel (Sahara)

*They have informants within our security system (Nigeria’s military said recently it had arrested a number of security personnel over links to Islamist extremist group Boko Haram, whose insurgency has killed hundreds of people.

The arrests came after soldiers from a special military unit deployed in the northeastern city of Maiduguri arrested an immigration officer, Grema Mohammed, for allegedly being an active member of Boko Haram, a military spokesman said.

Boko Haram is blamed for deadly attacks that have killed more than 1,400 people since 2010 as part of an insurgency in northern and central Nigeria.

The arrest “led to further arrests of some other security personnel that had been participating in various terrorist attacks in Borno and Yobe states,” Lieutenant Colonel Sagir Musa said of the two states in northeastern Nigeria, where Boko Haram has been based… http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j8u4K8EJ1niSYbJoYmXX2__d7olA?docId=CNG.8f3911cf91ecd80e7bb405b134a8bbe7.141)

*They use yam sellers, and other errand people for reconnaissance (spying on targets) http://www.punchng.com/news/we-use-yam-hawking-to-spy-on-our-targets-terror-suspect/

*They are promised 72 virgins (http://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/12/suleja-bombing-suspects-were-promised-72-virgins-each-witness/)

*They recruit from amongst the poor and downtrodden in the north who have been neglected and brainwashed by their elders for decades while the elders kids enjoy the good life abroad

*Theý LIE that they are operating within ISLAMIC INJUNCTIONS when the QU’RAN and PROPHET MOHAMMED (SAW) does NOT SUPPORT their madness:

CHRISTIANS are Bombing the Churches in the North – El-Rufai.(http://www.informationng.com/2012/06/el-rufai-claims-christians-are-behind-boko-haram-in-a-plot-to-destabilize-the-north.html)

We Only Bomb Churches Not Mosques Says Boko Haram
http://www.naijapundit.com/news/we-only-bomb-churches-not-mosques-says-boko-haram

1. “Convert to Islam or no dialogue” Boko Haram tells Jonathan http://www.peoplesdaily-online.com/news/national-news/29098-convert-to-islam-or-no-dialogue-boko-haram-tells-jonathan DATE 27/01/2012

2. Christians MUST CONVERT to ISLAM http://elombah.com/index.php/latest-news/11514-boko-haram-claims-responsibility-for-yesterday-s-bombings-says-christians-must-convert-to-islam-to-have-peace Date 18/06/2012

What does the Qur’an have to say about this:

Allah Most Exalted says;

“.. And do not kill yourselves [or one another]. Indeed, Allah is to you ever Merciful. And whoever does that in aggression and injustice – then We will drive him into a Fire. And that, for Allah , is [always] easy.” [Qur’an 4:29 – 4:30]

Those misguided individuals, who kill innocent people in the name of Islam, are NOT representatives of the faith they claim to uphold and defend and if they do not repent they will dwell in hell forever.

And so, instead of the Qur’an granting them any kind of reward to those who kill themselves and others, for whatever purpose, the Qur’an clearly states that anyone who commit acts such as suicide will be forever burned in HELL.

Also in the Quran 109:6 Allah said to prophet Muhammed SAW. Tell the unbelievers they should hold there own religion and you should hold yours

Single Term: North Moves Against Jonathan http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/10/seven-year-single-tenure-north-moves-against-jonathan/
”When OBJ was sworn in 1999, he met 35 Perm Secs, 26 of them were from the North”

North ready for Nigeria’s breakup–Junaid Mohammed http://www.naijapundit.com/news/north-ready-for-nigeria-s-breakup-junaid-mohammed

By Lugards 1914 Amalgamation Document, Any Region Can Secede in 2014-Shuluwahttp://www.naijapundit.com/news/by-lugards-1914-amalgamation-document-any-region-can-secede-in-2014-shuluwa Date Published: 29/11/2012

Lord Lugard Created Nigeria to Last for 100 Years Only-IBB
http://www.naijapundit.com/news/lord-lugard-created-nigeria-to-last-for-100-years-only-ibb

2015 may be Nigeria’s last election –Junaid Mohammed
http://thenationonlineng.net/new/news/2015-may-be-nigerias-last-election-junaid-mohammed/ March 17, 2013

‘What Is Happening in Northern Nigeria Is Ethnic and Religious Cleansing’ – Italian Minister http://fb.me/17L8w5SSE

SSS confirms Pointblanknews.com Exclusive, Accuses Politicians of bombing

http://www.pointblanknews.com/News/os5125.html
The Nigeria State Security Services, SSS, has finally confirmed that politicians who lost out during the last general Elections were responsible for the spate of Bombings in Nigeria, confirming an earlier exclusive published by Pointblanknews.com on September 2010.

Spokesperson of the Security Agency, Merylyn Ogar said on a Television program monitored in Nigeria that past political leaders are deliberately undermining the Federal Government.

According to her, “They believe they should be in power and once they are not there, then they would have to discredit the government,” adding, by the time the Service reveals their identities, Nigerians would be surprised…NOW WATCH HAROLD SMITH’s confession on the FRAUD that is NIGERIA (INCLUDING BOKO HARMERS) http://haroldsmithmemorial.wordpress.com/tv-interview/

NOW WHO OR WHAT IS BOKO HARAM?
”Whatever happens in the North is our own doing – Sultan of Sokoto
Respected Islamic cleric and Sultan of Sokoto Dr. Muhammed Sa’ad Abubakar III has said that the present insecurity and other associated challenges tearing the northern region apart were caused by the region itself.

The traditional ruler said this while speaking in Kaduna at a meeting of the Northern Governors Peace and Reconciliation Committee. He noted that the problem of the north will remain the problem of the entire country, since the north could not be left with its problems alone”.
http://dailypost.com.ng/2013/01/15/whatever-happens-in-the-north-is-our-own-doing-sultan-of-sokoto/

Northern Leaders Looked Sideways When B’Haram Members Were Being Trained By Al-Qaeda, Says Emir Who Opposes Amnesty http://www.informationng.com/2013/03/northern-leaders-looked-sideways-when-bharam-members-were-being-trained-by-al-qaeda-says-emir-who-opposes-amnesty.html

Jonathan Has Failed in Securing Nigeria so Power Must Return to North-Atiku, Bugaje – Naija Pundit http://www.naijapundit.com/news/jonathan-has-failed-in-securing-nigeria-so-power-must-return-to-north-atiku-bugaje

A Northerner Must Emerge in 2015 Or Nigeria Will Divide- Lawal Kaita http://www.naijapundit.com/news/a-northerner-must-emerge-in-2015-or-nigeria-will-divide-lawal-kaita

Arewa youths oppose elders over 2015 presidency http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=107326%3Aarewa-youths-oppose-elders-over-2015-presidency-&catid=1%3Anational&Itemid=559 11/12/2012

“We all talk about Jonathan. He is not responsible for our ill luck. These problems have been building up for decades and are the results of the activities of previous governments. Jonathan is not a magician, the problems that have built up over four decades, you wouldn’t expect Jonathan to come up and solve them all. And Nigerians are not giving him the opportunity to have the peace of mind to deal with the problems. During election, certain people said they were going to make the country ungovernable for him. Is the country governable now?” – Dr Frederick Fasheun, founder of Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC)

“They Tricked us Into Fighting Igbos During Civil War” – Middle Belt Group Says They Are Not Part of Northern Nigeria http://www.nairaland.com/922820/tricked-us-into-fighting-igbos

Northern politicians created Boko Haram – Mustapha Jokolo, former Emir of Gwandu – Says North should forget about the presidency in 2015 http://www.nairaland.com/897900/al-mustapha-jokolo-bombshell-north

WORDS ON MARBLE: “Since the leaders now don’t listen to anybody but do whatever they wish, there is nothing the north can do.” – Rtd Gen Buhari MAY 2012

2015: North will mobilise against Jonathan http://nationalmirroronline.net/news/36760.html

Arewa Elder To Jonathan – Say You Won’t Contest in 2015 – Naija Pundit http://www.naijapundit.com/news/arewa-elder-to-jonathan-say-you-won-t-contest-in-2015 – August 2012

There Will Be Bloodshed In 2015 – Gen. Muhammadu Buhari http://mobile.saharareporters.com/press-release/buhari’s-prediction-bloodshed-2015-and-comments-boko-haram-sad-and-unfortunate-preside

Buhari has taken the Hausas hostage – Lamido http://www.businessdayonline.com/NG/index.php/news/111-politics/39243-buhari-has-taken-the-hausas-hostage–lamido 13/06/ 2012

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.” -Leo Tolstoy

My suggestions for Nigeria’s National Conference:

FIRST AND FOREMOST, A proper headcount with biometric and satellite technology to undo the fraudulent past census.

1. Contract the 36 states into SIX (6) REGIONS with self-funding management systems.
Every State in Nigeria has things to bring to the table in Abuja. 30% Derivation to the centre, and 70% to the regions. All former states become PROVINCES and LGAs remain as they are.

2. Go back to pre-1966 Parliamentary system of government with one premier per region (6 premiers) or adopt a modified-presidential system of govt with 6 Vice Presidents (one per region)

3. Digitalize all civil service operations and prune down the waste in number of government workers in the federal and regional parastatals. The USA has about 300,000,000 citizens and just 800,000+ federal workers. The US also has 18 items on its exclusive list while Nigeria has a whopping 68 items on its exclusive list, thus the centre siphons most of the funds meant for regional development

4. Remove ”state of origin” from our national psyche

5. Ensure secularity of the Nigerian nation-state. No sharia ANYWHERE in Nigeria

6. Elections should be held once in 5 years for Prime Minister or President and Regional premiers or governors

7. All criminal laws must be tweaked to allow for heavier punishment on corruption in virtually every facet of our lives

With the above in place, I believe Nigeria will be reset on a greater path to growth and development..

Henry Omoregie

All other suggestions are welcome

PS: Regions can determine how they need to run themselves politically. But Sharia will be impossible because there are Christians in virtually every state in Nigeria. It would be disservice to them to sharia-lize any region. Do not forget 1. Regions are not states as they are larger, and 2. Pre-1966 coup there was no Sharia in the north. Ahmadu Bello even established BREWERIES in the North! As per military and police, I believe there should be regional police but the military should be no go areas.

Confab: We won’t accept no-go areas – Afenifere, Ohanaeze, others

The pan-Yoruba group, Afenifere, and its Igbo counterpart, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, have said they will reject any move to limit discussions at the national dialogue being planned by President Goodluck Jonathan.

Afenifere, which spoke through its Secretary, Chief Seinde Arogbofa, in an interview with one of our correspondents in Akure on Thursday, said that the proposed national dialogue should not have no-go areas.

Also, the Secretary General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Dr. Joe Nwaorgu, told Saturday PUNCH on the telephone on Thursday that the dialogue should be frank and blunt, adding that all national issues should be discussed.

The Afenifere secretary explained why the group was insisting on a sovereign national conference.

He said that it was necessary that the conference was designated as sovereign so that the outcome could be taken seriously.

“The sovereignty we are talking about is to ensure that the discussions are taken seriously. It is to make sure that what the people arrive at is taken seriously by the government,” Arogbofa added.

According to him, government appointees should not participate in the discussion.

He said ethnic and social- cultural associations as well as other pressure groups should take part in the conference.

Arogbofa added that bodies such as the Nigeria Labour Congress; the Academic Staff Union of Universities and civil societies should be invited to the national dialogue.

He said, “There should be nothing like ‘no-go-areas.’ Nigerians should be free to discuss all the issues of contention so that they can find ways of living together as one people.

“We also believe that the legislature should be represented. The government should not participate. The government is not the people.”

According to him, political parties are also essential groups within the polity and therefore should also have representatives at the conference.

On the mode of election or selection of the representatives, he said, “One person should represent each group. Bigger groups should get two representatives each to ensure balance.”

According to him, the Itshekiri tribe is a smaller unit when compared with the Yoruba and so while the smaller units should get a representative, the bigger units should get two.

Also, Ohanaeze Ndigbo said, “Nothing should be sacrosanct. All cards are open. It should be such that any group should be free to say, ‘I don’t want to stay and their position will be respected.”

The Ohanaeze Ndigbo secretary general said that all the six geo-political zones in the country should be represented at the conference.

He said, “The zones should meet and articulate their positions based on the ethnic nationalities in the zones. The South -West has the Yoruba ethnic nationality. The South- South knows its ethnic nationalities. The South -East is made up of the Igbo while the Hausa and Fulani are the dominant ethnic nationalities in the North- West.

“From the North- East, the Kanuri and all the smaller ethnic nationalities should come. It should be the same thing with the North-Central zone.

“The dialogue should be based on the ethnic nationalities that the white man met in 1900 before the amalgamation,” he said.

The Ohanaeze secretary said representation should be determined by the ethnic nationalities, not by selection or appointment by the President or government. “The President’s hand must be cleared of this,” he said.

Nwaorgu further said that the number of people representing a zone or ethnic nationality should not matter. “What should matter is the quality representation and whether the representatives are speaking the mind of the group they represent or not.

“We are not dividing money there. We are talking for the betterment of Nigeria, so far as they are speaking the mind of their people,” he said.

On its part, the Niger Delta Youth Parliament has said that the selection of representatives for the dialogue should not be done by governors of politicians.

The NDYP National Coordinator, Mr. Imoh Okoko, said Nigerians should rather be allowed to select those that would speak for them at the conference, adding that governors and other politicians should not be allowed to meddle in the exercise.

Okoko also expressed the need to select some youth leaders from various ethnic groups to be part of the discussants during the proposed conference.

He said, “The governors have always had their way in the selection of those to represent Nigeria in the past and at the end, nothing much came out of it. So, politicians, especially the governors, should not select representatives for us.

“Nigerians can pick those to represent them at the National Conference. The youths should be involved. They should be allowed to say their minds on the way forward for the country.

“Apart from that, traditional rulers know the line of thought of their people. Therefore, their presence will be important during the National Dialogue. I am surprised that the Federal Government did not consider the youths to be part of the committee on the National Conference.”

Okoko, however, maintained that issues bordering on resource control, effective implementation of the Local Content Law, local government autonomy, true federalism and genuine population census should be discussed.

But the National Coordinator, Coalition of Northern Politicians, Academics, Professionals and Businessmen, Dr. Junaid Mohammed, has said the National Assembly should be allowed to drive the proposed National Conference.

Mohammed said this in a telephone interview with Saturday PUNCH, in Abuja, on Thursday.

He argued that members of the National Assembly, who are the elected representatives of the people, should be allowed to drive the process on the basis of the fact that they were elected by the people.

The physician turned politician noted that the National Assembly would be rendered redundant if those clamouring for a Sovereign National Conference had their way.

He said, “The National Assembly should lead the discussions so that Nigerians will know that we are dealing with the people who are our representatives.”

According to him, those proposing that the conference should be based on ethnic nationalities cannot tell with certainty how many such nationalities exist in Nigeria and where they are located.

He said, “What will be the basis of representation in the so- called Sovereign National Conference?”

He expressed doubts about the motive behind the proposed conference, adding that it was becoming clear that even those championing the call for convening the conference were yet to do their homework.

He said, “Each time we talk about this kind of conference it looks like exercises in fraud.

“Now, he (President Jonathan) has appointed a chairman and a secretary two days after he appointed 15 other people.”

Junaid warned that the National Assembly stood the risk of becoming redundant should the sovereign national conference proposal sail through.

He said the conference should provide answers to the challenges of poverty, illiteracy, insecurity, corruption and inadequate health facilities among other social infrastructural decay.

“Talking about no-go areas is neither here nor there. Nobody knows what the agenda of the President is, they are determined to force an agenda on us; let them tell us what they want to do then we can set parameters.

“In any case, Nigeria is still one country today because a majority of Nigerians want it to remain so, if Nigerians decide not to remain as one united country, no amount of no-go areas can force Nigeria to remain as one.”

http://www.punchng.com/news/confab-we-wont-accept-no-go-areas-afenifere-ohanaeze-others/

Enyeribe Chikodi Azubuike POSTED: ”After going through some sections of the constitution of USA, I was dumbfounded when I saw that after 200 years, it’s still boldly written that any American states have the right to secede if they choose to. Surprisingly, no American state has ever asked for secession even with this secession right their constitution accords them.

Why? Because all American states feel protected and fulfilled under the country called United States of America (USA). After independence, it became obvious to Indians that they had so much that divided them than what united them. Thus, India broke up into Pakistan, Bangladesh and India. Many countries followed India’s footstep after independence. Recently, Scotland demanded to opt-out of United Kingdom (UK). Their demand was gladly received and UK authority promised to test it through referendum come next year.

In Nigeria, our Hausa/Fulani military imposed constitution sees secessionist movement as an act of treasonable felony. Thus, freedom fighter like Ken Sarowiwa of Ogoni land was hanged by Gen. Sani Abacha. What did Sarowiwa do? He led a group called Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP). Also, Raph Uwazuruike has been imprisoned several times for leading a group called Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB).

For 53 years, Nigerians have been battling to live together but it’s obvious that it has not worked but a given section of the country (Hausa/Fulani) wants us to continue living together because they are benefitting with terms like quota system, federal character, educationally advantaged/disadvantaged states, dubious census figure, fraudulent federal system of government at the excruciating expense of others. Do you know that all the 36 states in Nigeria were created by northerners? Tell me the state a southerner created.

This is why Kano alone has 44 local government areas and Katsina 34. To maintain the status quo, they (Hausa/Fulani) must either be in charge of Aso Rock or dictate who rules Nigeria. Otherwise, the country must be made ungovernable for the president. This is just the reason behind the emergence of boko haram. Unfortunately, when a man tells his child to feign madness and attack people, little would the man know that the madness might turn real one day and the man will become a victim of the child’s madness. Tell me the country where peace has ever existed in the face of injustice. You don’t beat a child and order the child not to cry”.

FACT, apart from Jonathan, No one has ever RULED NIGERIA if he is not military or LOYAL to Hausa-Fulani and Hands power back to them (eg GOWON who was overthrown, and OBJ who handed over to SHAGARI AND UMYA). No southern CIVILIAN HAS EVER RULED 9JA (Abiola would have been the first but he was murdered). AND NOTE: No coup by a non HAUSAFULANI HAS EVER SUCCEEDED….ALL COUPS by HAUSA FULANI have ALWAYS succeeded…

EXCERPTS FROM HAROLD SMITH’S CONFESSIONS: ”The north was seriously encouraged to go into the military. According to him, they believe that the south may attend western education, but future leaders will always come from military background. Their traditional rulers were to be made influential and super human. The northerners were given accelerated promotions both in the military and civil service to justify their superiority over the south. Everything was to work against the south”….

This piece was first Published on the 2nd of October, 2013 via Henry Omoregie’s Blog


The Opinion contained in this piece are the Author’s and do not reflect Sayelba Times’ Editorial Policy

Why Buhari may not defeat Jonathan – by Abimbola Adelakun

Lagos State Governor, Babatunde Fashola, recently dismissed insinuations he would be a running mate to the All Progressives Congress presidential aspirant, Maj. Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd.). Since the recrudescence of Buhari’s campaign, Fashola’s rejection is proof that some folk in the APC still have their feet on the grounds of reality after all.

Buhari has been running for presidency since 2003 and though his feet are not yet tired, there is something tiresome about his recurring candidacy. For one, a lot of intellectual energy is usually expended analysing him and the many baggage he represents. In the process, core issues that should be tackled at election time get suspended.

It is perhaps a testimony to Buhari’s political capital that he can overshadow the terrain and send tremors into the camp of the incumbent candidate and his party. His entrance into the 2011 race gave that election the vivacity it badly needed. This time, however, if the APC fields Buhari against President Goodluck Jonathan, the odds may not be in their favour. The APC cannot present itself as a party with an ideology of change and still field a 72-year-old man who will want to run two terms that will expire when he is 81.

That is why pairing Buhari with Fashola appealed to the merchandisers of the idea. They are being pragmatic. Each time Buhari gets on his messianic horse and rides onto the political arena, he comes with the same unevolved message of ridding Nigeria of corruption and rescuing our wretched souls from our collective national misery.

Even the most ardent Buharist is careful to not ascribe to him either lofty visions of nation building or revolutionary economic ideas and ideals; Buhari lacks this ethos and such message will likely be doomed before it even leaves the idea factory. But there is one solution to this yawning absence: to pair him with a younger, vibrant, intelligent and charismatic leader.

The idea is, while Buhari purportedly solves the corruption problem, his deputy will do the harder -and perhaps more cerebral- job of rebuilding Nigeria’s crumbling institutions. It is for this reason he has run with colourful running mates in the past – Chuba Okadigbo in 2003; Edwin Ume-Ezeoke in 2007 and Pastor Tunde Bakare in 2011. They are all selected on the basis of region, religion and perhaps an even more important consideration – they can implement developmental policies.

In fact, even Buhari so premises his persona over the social liberatory ideas he should be seen espousing that his latest presidential declaration speech was shorn of inspiration; it barely sparked zeal in anyone who wants a change from the miasma Nigeria is stuck due to centuries of ignorant leadership.

Although one can argue that Nigeria’s problems barely change, and therefore the language with which we tackle them cannot but remain the same. Yet, by sticking to the same recycled stuff, it shows that Buhari has not acquired a complex understanding of how to deal with Nigeria’s issues. The static and repetitive nature of his ideas is just as frightening as Jonathan’s cluelessness. If anything will ever be achieved while he is in office, it would have to be left to his deputy who would also give Buhari’s campaign the missing phrenic colour.

Yet, those who tout this idea always seem to miss one point: they over-romanticise the relationship between a president and the vice-president and how it will play out. In a democracy, the office of the VP is not of that much consequence and is easily subjected to humiliation by an insecure principal who does not want to be supplanted.

It was President Harry Truman that once said, “Look at all the vice-presidents in history. Where are they? They were about as useful as a cow’s fifth teat.”

Nigeria’s recent history shows how tenuous this relationship can be in the examples of Olusegun Obasanjo and Abubakar Atiku; Governor Rasheed Ladoja and Adebayo-Alao-Akala; Governor Bola Tinubu and Kofoworola Bucknor-Akerele and so on. The instances where we hardly hear of rancour between the principal executive and deputy are those where the former has managed to keep a tight rein on the latter, depriving him or her of funds or relevance that can boost his or her public profile. Why would anyone imagine Buhari – assuming he manages to hook a good VP candidate – not clamp down on any assertiveness such a person tries to display?

As things stand, Nigeria needs a strong and viable candidate, one with creative imagination and a vision. Buhari does not come across as the person who can fit this profile. It is not enough that he is said to have a panacea for corruption – assuming he can actually achieve that under a lopsided democratic system– he should also advance a development agenda. He should display an ability to espouse ideas that resonate far more meaningfully than what currently obtains.

Unlike what his advisers think, corruption is not Nigeria’s sole problem even if it appears that way and Buhari’s Spartanism is not a guarantee of either innovation or foresight. If you subtract corruption from the present government, it will still not achieve a bounce.

In the few months before election, is there any possibility that Buhari will have a better run this time and probably defeat President Jonathan? It is doubtful. Even though many Nigerians are probably weary of Jonathan’s government by now, they are still practical enough to understand that another four years of Jonathan’s government will not kill them. It might bring Nigeria to her knees but at the same time, it is a pain that can be endured.

Buhari’s candidature may end up producing a boomerang effect that will likely favour Jonathan. Those who have previously planned to fold their arms on Election Day will be motivated into voting Jonathan, warts and all, just to keep Buhari far from Aso Rock. He has not demonstrated that he represents real change and there is real danger in giving up the familiar cluelessness of Jonathan for an untried one.

There are other reasons to be afraid of a Buhari presidency: his plebian following. Those who oppose Buhari for his perceived fundamentalism forget that Buhari is no religious nut; he is a religion himself. His followers are largely those that believe in him with unexamined devotion. Anybody with such authority over people’s minds should not be tried with the absolutism of power the Nigerian brand of democracy endows on a political leader. Those who oppose Buhari are very aware of this and that is another reason to keep him far from Aso Rock Villa come 2015.


The views contained in this article are the Author’s and do not reflect the Editorial policy of Sayelba Times