By Vitus Ozoke
I am going to torture your patience and strain the limits of your tolerance by providing you with the constitutional eligibility criteria to be president in 18 countries of the world, including Nigeria. But I propose to provide some context before that.
For the past few weeks, the shenanigan in Nigeria’s political and social circles has been the educational certificate of the leading presidential candidate in the coming February presidential elections in Nigeria, General Mohamed Buhari. For those of us who follow politics around the world, does insistence on a certificate ring a bell? Yes, it does. Led by the obnoxious empty vessel, Donald Trump, right wing Republicans, woefully lacking in substantive issues that add value to the life of the American voter, resorted to the callous de-legitimization and dehumanization of President Obama, by demanding his birth certificate in 2011/2012.
“He is not one of us”, they charged, “he is not American, he is Kenyan”. “If he is one of us”, they challenged, “let him produce his birth certificate”. Well, President Obama’s campaign, after initial hesitation, did eventually produce and publish Obama’s birth certificate from his birth state of Hawaii.
I want to stress that the campaign hesitated to produce Obama’s birth certificate, and there is a reason for that. You see, in the history of the United States, no presidential candidate had ever been challenged to produce their birth certificate. And in the history of the United States, no previous president had been nonwhite, certainly not Black. Therefore, by demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate, the bigots were merely reinforcing the tired mentality that America is a white country for white people. And if that is accepted as true, then, only white people can be president of the United States.
So, Barack Obama was essentially being reminded that he was not “one of us”. And to prove to Obama that he was not, the Trump and Republican clown gang was going to dehumanize him by tasking him to present his papers, the paper permit they issued him. That should give maximum offense to any human being, even worse so, to an already serving president of the United States.
That was the hesitation of the Obama campaign. Do you dignify the buffoonery and antics of bigots by presenting them with your birth certificate? Do you satisfy the base instincts of racist nitwits by proving your American bona fide to them? But when the clown show became a distraction for the Obama campaign, they swallowed their pride and published Obama’s birth certificate.
There are some stark parallels between Obama’s birth certificate and Buhari’s high school certificate. First is the ‘otherization’ politics that treats one person or group as existing on the periphery. It is the politics of exclusion. In Obama’s case, the “birthers”, as Trump and his gang of bozos are called, were determined to cast Barack Hussein Obama as an outsider, the ‘other’, who is not one of us.
In Buhari’s case, when you consider that his opponent holds a PhD certificate, presumably, then, it becomes less difficult to recognize the traces and contours of elitist segregation and outcasting. This is “Dr.” Jonathan’s way of announcing to Nigeria’s academic world, and that world is large, that General Buhari is not one of ‘us’. It is the Dr.’s way of excluding the uneducated. It is classist politics at its best.
I don’t want to quarrel with classist politics, but I want to point out its hypocrisy in this case. And its hypocrisy runs on two cylinders in Dr. Jonathan’s case. First, President Dr. Jonathan has done more to cripple education in Nigeria than to advance it. Under his watch, university teachers have on numerous occasions been on strike for several months, and students have spent more days and months at home than they have spent receiving instructions in the classroom. Yet, the obligation of any responsible government in any society worth its existence is the proper education of its citizenry. It is an obligation second only to the protection of life and property, another area of major deficit and failure under Dr. Jonathan.
Second, Dr. Jonathan’s personal and official conducts, including his utterances, have called to question his claim to the terminal certification of education. Many Nigerians have questioned his educational profile, challenging him to produce his doctoral dissertation for content rigor and plagiarism scrutiny. Do you blame them? How do they not? How do they not, when you have a president and PhD holder who insists that stealing is not corruption; and that the only reason he cannot unleash the full measure of force on Boko Haram terrorists is because they are ‘our’ brothers? And what PhD holder explains his state pardon of a convicted public looter as the looter being his former boss? So, I will not quarrel with elitist classism, but I will take serious exception to its hypocrisy and agenda.
Isn’t it strangely ironic that a man who came to national attention through the back channels, and who has been a bloody civilian his entire life, will seek to shut out a patriotic General who volunteered his life and service in defense of his country? It takes uncommon guts for a civilian who all his life has slept calm and easy under the protection and security provided by military Generals to turn around and seek to disqualify a General from participation in the politics of his country. I can’t imagine Republicans, even in their bumbling rascality, attempt to shut out General Colin Powel from participation in American politics under any guise or pretext. But this is Nigeria, where abnormal things surface normally.
When will Nigerians start asking serious questions? Of every country I know, Nigeria is the country where education is the least affordable. Even a low-grade public education in Nigeria, is priced beyond the reach of most Nigerians. At a time when the United States and other serious societies are expanding opportunities for free education, to include two years of community college, in the case of the U.S., the cost of public education, as low grade as it is, is on the rise in Nigeria, and many children and families are priced out of it.
Yet, the Constitutions of the United States and most countries of the world do not include education in the eligibility criteria to be president. Let me state it in another way. America and the rest of the world provide opportunities for their citizens to be educated; but Nigeria does not. America does not require education as one of the criteria to be president; but Nigeria does. What are we missing here? Where is the disconnect? Why are Nigerians not asking serious questions?
If the Nigerian political elite have neglected to fund education and offer opportunities for every Nigerian to get good and affordable education, yet, have made education a requirement to be president or to occupy other levels of political leadership, does it not suggest a criminal elite conspiracy to monopolize leadership? Again, when will Nigerians wake up and demand change? When will Nigerians demand a new direction?
When will Nigerians understand that Nigeria’s certificates have become a serious racket? The political and economic elite who have the resources, usually pilfered from public coffers, are the ones who can afford the high cost of low grade education in the country. And in many cases, these are certificates that are not foregrounded in knowledge. They are bought. There are too many certificates in Nigeria, yet too little education. We have placed way too much premium on certification that we don’t care about education.
In Nigeria, it is Dr. this, Dr. that, and these are individuals who cannot get out of a 3rd Grade in a serious educational system. It makes you weep when you read the quality of contributions on social media by Nigeria’s youth who have, presumably, graduated university. It is as horrible as it is horrifying. We have failed and continued to fail this generation. When will Nigerians demand a new direction? Frankly, this path is completely unsustainable!
So, this goes way beyond Buhari. This is an elite conspiracy. There can be no greater irony than a president and his ruling party, who have destroyed education in Nigeria, turning around to want to disqualify Nigerians from participation in the politics of their country, because they do not possess the education that the president and his ruling party have destroyed. It sounds crazy, but there is a method and deliberate design to that craziness. This goes beyond Buhari. This is an elite conspiracy.
Finally, to underscore the elitist debauchery going on in Nigeria, here is a list of 18 countries and the constitutional qualifications that potential candidates for president must possess. If I have tortured you enough already, which I believe I have, and I apologize, just know that only Nigeria has education as one of the qualifications to run for president. And I have already argued the elite conspiracy and hypocrisy behind it. Here is the list, and have yourself a pleasant shock and surprise:
1. Afghanistan
Article 62 of the Constitution of Afghanistan of 2004 states that a candidate for the office of President or Vice-President must: Be a Muslim citizen of Afghanistan, born of Afghan parents; not be a citizen of another country; be at least forty years old when declaring candidacy; not have been convicted of crimes against humanity, a criminal act or deprived of civil rights by court; not have previously served more than two term as President.
2. Albania
The 1998 Constitution, Article 86, Section 2 “Only an Albanian citizen by birth who has been a resident in Albania for not less than the past 10 years and who has reached the age of 40 may be elected President.”
3. Algeria
Article 73, section 1 of the Constitution, 1996, provides that “To be eligible to the Presidency of the Republic, the candidate should: have, solely, the Algerian nationality by origin; be a Muslim; be more than forty (40) years-old the day of the election; enjoy full civil and political rights; prove the Algerian nationality of the spouse; (if born before July 1942) justify his participation in the 1st of November 1954 Revolution; and if born after July 1942, “justify the non-involvement of the parents of the candidate in actions hostile to the 1st of November 1954 Revolution”; submit a public declaration of his personal and real estate existing either within Algeria or abroad.
4. Angola
Article 58 of the 1992 Constitution provides that “Natural born Angolan citizens of over 35 years of age and enjoying full civil and political rights shall be eligible to the post of President of the Republic.”
5. Argentina
Article 89 of the Argentine Constitution provides that “To be elected President or Vice-President of the Nation it is necessary to have been born in the Argentine territory, or to be the son of a native born citizen if born in a foreign country; and to have the other qualifications required to be elected senator. Section 55 requires that to be elected Senator, one must “have attained to the age of 30 years”; “been six years a citizen of the Nation” and “have an annual income of two thousand strong pesos or similar revenues”.
6. Armenia
Article 50 of the 1999 Constitution: “Every person having attained the age of thirty five, having been a citizen of the Republic of Armenia for the preceding ten years, having permanently resided in the Republic for the preceding ten years, and having the right to vote is eligible for the Presidency.”
7. Austria
Article 60, section (3) of the 1983 Constitution provides: “Only a person who has House of Representatives franchise and was thirty five years old before the first of January of the year in which the election is held can be elected Federal President.”
8. Bangladesh
Article 48, section 5 of the Constitution provides three factors which disqualify one for the presidency: being less than 35 years old, not being qualified to be elected to parliament, and having previously been impeached under the current Constitution. The qualifications for election to parliament are that one be a citizen and be at least 25 years old (which is superseded by the presidential requirement of 35 years). Further, one can be disqualified from election to parliament for the following reasons:
Being declared by a court to be of unsound mind; Being an undercharged insolvent; Acquiring citizenship or allegiance to another state; Having been convicted of a crime with a prison sentence of two or more years in the past five years; Holds certain offices of profit under the government; or is otherwise disqualified by law.
9. Belarus
Article 80 of the Constitution of Belarus states that any citizen of Belarus who is 35 years old, eligible to vote, and has resided in Belarus for 10 years may be elected president.
10. Brazil
Article 14, Section III (3) of the Constitution requires a candidate to be:
Of Brazilian nationality; Eligible to vote; Registered to vote; Living in electoral district; Member of a political party; Minimum age of 35.
11. Colombia
Article 191 of the Colombian Constitution requires that to be president, one must be Colombian by birth (“colombiano por nacimiento”), have full citizenship (“ciudadano en ejercicio”) and older than 30. (“mayor de treinta años”).
12. France
The required personal qualifications for a candidate for the presidential elections are the same as those for any other official election, as set forth in the French Electoral code (Code électoral). A candidate for an election must be a citizen, have attained the age of 18 years, be qualified to vote, not be ineligible by dint of a criminal conviction or judicial decision and have a bank account.
Law No. 62-1292 of 6 November 1962 on the election of the President by universal suffrage (Loi n°62-1292 du 6 novembre 1962 relative à l’élection du Président de la République au suffrage universel) further requires presidential candidates to be nominated by at least five hundred qualified elected officials, such as members of Parliament and mayors. New law modified in its article #20 the second line of article #154 of French Electoral code (Code électoral) to decrease to 18 years old instead of 21 the minimum age to candidate, in 1974.
13. Germany
Article 54, section 1, of the German constitution states that “Any German who is entitled to vote in Bundestag elections and has attained the age of forty may be elected”. Article 116, section 1, defines “German” as “a person who possesses German citizenship or who has been admitted to the territory of the German Reich within the boundaries of December 31, 1937 as a refugee or expellee of German ethnic origin or as the spouse or descendant of such person.”
14. India
Article 58 of the Constitution sets the principle qualifications one must meet to be eligible to the office of the President. A President must be:
a citizen of India; of 35 years of age or above; qualified to become a member of the Lok Sabha. A person shall not be eligible for election as President if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State or under any local or other authority subject to the control of any of the said Governments.
15. Mexico
The constitution of Mexico requires the candidate to be natural-born citizen of Mexico with at least one parent who is a natural-born citizen of Mexico. He should be at least 35 years of age and should have resided in Mexico for at least 20 years in his entire lifetime and for the entire year before the election. He should not be a secretary or under-secretary of state, attorney general, or governor of a state at least 6 months prior to the election.
16. The Philippines
Article VII, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution provides that no person may be elected President unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines, a registered voter, able to read and write, at least forty years of age on the day of the election, and a resident of the Philippines for at least ten years immediately preceding such election.
17. United States of America
According to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S Constitution, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
18. Nigeria
According to Section 131 of the 1999 Constitution, “A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if –
(a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth;
(b) he has attained the age of forty years;
(c) he is a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party; and
(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent.
Culled from The Due Process Advocates (DPA) Facebook Group